แฟ้มประวัติNot There Yetรูปถ่ายบล็อกรายการเพิ่มเติม ![]() | วิธีใช้ |
|
12 กันยายน Last gasp? I'll try one more time. I actually posted this information last March, when I was only able to get into my blog after 30 minutes of trying - at least six times my maximum frustration threshold. So I decamped, as so many grownups end up doing, to Blogger. My space there is also called 'Not There Yet' (I picked that here 3 years ago or whatever, and I have grown to like it, or at least I am accustomed to it - 'like' is such a strong term) and my URL or whatever is www.DavidShag.blogspot.com. I think. (And no, I DON'T know how to turn that into a link.) Drop in, if u remember me - well, if you remember me favorably at least. This means YOU, Kit. Oh, and I am retired. I mean from work, not blogging. Retired in a good way. Not pronounced 'retard' wherever you are from or whatever you may think. David. 28 กุมภาพันธ์ Doin's in Our AreaYou know those pileated woodpeckers that you almost never see outside of bird books, which have those pointed heads the shape of which looks remarkably reminiscent of one of the flying dinosaurs - so much so that after hearing that dinosaurs were antecedents of birds, not lizards, you go, "Duh!" and slap your forehead and wonder why YOU didn't come up with that? And then you realize (if you are not of a religious bent) that your whole life has been stunted intellectually by believing what you heard instead of your own eyes? The religious, of course, never DO realize that. Well, one of those very birds was hanging around moving from branch to branch in my pear tree just now in a vain attempt to get at the rich nutty goodness of my seed-infused suet block which I have hanging on a tricky jerrybuilt set of hooks and wires in a (vain) attempt to keep it from the squirrels without realizing that it also precludes the visits from equally weighty avians whom I would love to see dining at my doorstep now and then. And as I reflected on what could be so rare as a visit from said woodpecker, i realized that a Shaggian visit to the blogosphere was about as rare, though considerably less lovely. So, deciding that one rare turn deserves another, here I am. Unfortunately a parallel can be drawn between the DavidShag degrees of busy-ness versus busy-ness as most people describe it, and a dog's perspective of life-expectancy years versus our idea of reasonably longevity. Given that caveat, I have been busy in DavidShag units, although at what exactly I can't say. Watching TV (Friday Night Lights is back - hooray!), reading Newsweek, getting cruise control put into my car to save the Shaggian driver's license - only $400 for the installation, and $200 for the rental car which I had to keep for a week, since the car surgery was done near Reedville and the work life ('life' being a bit of an oxymoronic concept in relation to my work) being suffered in Smallville with 150 miles between the two, so I had to take a week-long rental. So my life being wee and small, and becoming ever wee-er and smaller as it sinks in that I will never be able to retire with the thin husk to which my personal fortune has been reduced (Hell of a job there, Georgie!) - a mere half of what it was a year ago at this time, I must write of the lives of others. I will note that my first cousin once removed, whom I have referred to herein previously as "Warren" was featured in an article in Penthouse, no less, amongst profiles of such celebs as Knievel, Junior and various sports figures and so on, who were termed 'bad-ass Americans', despite the fact that the lad in question has a rather fine ass in my view. Well, not in my direct view, alas, but you know what I mean. And Life with Mother has had a turn that led to Luke bringing down the house at a local hospital. There is nothing that Mom hates so much as going to the doctor, and now that she is demented to a degree that all she understands of medical procedures is that strange men are making her take off her clothes, this aversion has become a pretty spectacular feature of her persona. So when Luke went to get Mom last week at Desolation Pines and found that she had fallen (out of bed, presumably) and her arm was bleeding and she was unable to walk, he knew that the day was not going to be the stroll in the park, metaphorically speaking, that he had envisioned. One is always concerned when one's mother cannot walk as a result of a fall, although it is a well-known fact that no Shaughnessy ever breaks a bone so it was unlikely that she had pulled that old senior citizen gag of the broken hip. She herself was in merry mood, chattering away six to the dozen on topics totally irrelevant to the current situation. Luke felt it was incumbent on him to drag her off to a local hospital. This is never an easy task in the Reedville area, since for one reason or another there is a local convention that decrees that ERs are always unavailable here when one requires them. This may be the only place in America where one has to schedule one's emergencies ahead of time. I remember once, long ago, I had what was later diagnosed as prostatitis (I may have that spelled wrong - spellchecker certainly thinks so - pretty darn uppity for software that thinks 'spellchecker' is spelled wrong), but the symptoms are 1) unbelievable knifelike agonies whenever one pees, accompanied with 2) discharge of quantities of blood from - well, from where you would imagine - teamed with a rather mean-spirited joke on the part of the body that dictates that the third symptom is that as soon as one finishes peeing one is seized with an intense need to pee again. Maybe that was partly because I had been drinking beer at the time, but whatever. Being younger by far at the time (I haven't drunk beer in 26 years, for starters), I was unable to take the long view about peeing blood - well, actually I didn't mind peeing blood so much - it could have been a great ice-breaker at a party, but the pain was something truly revelatory. It got so I had to grip the walls and clench my teeth hard to get through it - it was a level of pain unique in my experience - and yeah, yeah, I know about the pain of childbirth and all that - don't even go there. And would you believe I had to call several local hospitals to find one whose ER had not been closed because of an overload of business that day? All this is beside the point except to illustrate why Luke had to convey Mom fifteen miles south to find that the ER there was unable to treat her and then fifteen miles north from his starting point (or 30 miles in toto from the unhelpful ER in the south, for the math-challenged). Mom was not liking this a whole lot, and Mom is a lot less reticent about her likes and dislikes than she was wont to be of yore. Far less did she like removing her clothes and being pinched and prodded by the prurient fingers of science. Poor Luke was seen as the cause of all this discomfort and personal embarrassment, and while Mom, not yet having lost her instinct for public politesse, is generally not terribly unpleasant to the actual medical personnel with whom she is dealing (or vice versa), she is more than willing to vent her displeasure on Luke without let or hindrance. Luke was pretty distraught in the first place, worrying about any injury that could render Mom unable to walk, and having to drive untold miles to get help and wait ages for service, all the while bearing an unending screed of complaint and vituperation for his pains. Luke is, to put it mildly, not known for his patience in any situation, and this was getting to the point where Mother Teresa herself might have muttered a discreet, "Damn it all." Finally the last straw was reached when she turn on him and said (in front of several medical personnel) "You! You bring me here to be stripped naked by these men to do nasty things!" and he riposted angrily, "Well, you made me go to Catholic school!" The folks in the hospital were highly amused. It turns out that the fall had merely aggravated her arthritic hips, which we had no idea she had. That is the way it has always been: you never knew if Mom was in pain. I literally never knew her to be in bed from any ailment in my entire life - or hers. I asked her once if she had been a little scared prior to my birth (I was the eldest), since if I were going to have nine pounds twelve ounces of anything - or even half that - come ripping out of my insides, I would have been prostrate with terror. "No," she said, "I didn't really think about it until it happened." Another family member who has been having a more interesting life than mine is Liam, my singing brother. Although it happened some time ago, I only heard about it when he dropped in this January and he and his wife and George and Luke and I were huddling about the fireplace - January was hellishly cold from start to finish, if 'hellish' is a term that can be applied to cold. It seems that Liam had, some time back, taken a night shift job at a 7-ll in Phoenix to supplement his microscopic income from writing and recording and performing music. One evening a girl had come in and asked for a pack of cigarettes. "You know," he said to us, "how you know you are screwing up and you just kind of watch yourself do it?" I do know, since I have often had that experience. "Nobody," he went on, "ever asks for a pack of cigarettes. They ask for Marlboros or whatever. All the alarm bells were ringing. But I went right ahead." "'What kind?' I asked her. "'Um, that white pack,' said she. More bells - she didn't even know the kind she smoked! "But I took her money and gave her the change. I laid the cigarettes on the counter. And then she started to leave without them. And the alarm bells became deafening. But was that enough for me? Oh no! I picked up the pack, held it up, and yelled, 'Hey, miss! You forgot your cigarettes!' And at that moment a flashbulb went off from outside the window. "Next day, in the local paper, there is a big picture of me holding up the pack of cigarettes. The headline talked about local stores ignoring the age checking for cigarette purchases, and underneath the picture the caption says says, 'Local clerk goes the extra mile.''" So that is what is happening with folks out my way who DO have lives... 11 มกราคม Death of a PigI just saw a familiar name in the Obits today.
But first, let me tell you about a woman whom I’ll call Annie. Annie was a middle-aged woman – over 50 - who was active in her church. She was from what is called the lower-middle class, which I would guess describes that end of the working class that gets by on their own efforts with nothing left over – pretty much the class of folks I came from, economically speaking. Annie was a quiet woman, acknowledged by all who knew her as having modest good taste in clothing, something of a stretch for her, I’d guess, given her budget. Because of her folks’ economic situation, Annie was unable to attend college, nor was she afforded any opportunity to better her education in another manner. With her quiet demeanor and other personal qualities, however, Annie had the good fortune to land a relatively decent job waiting on folks much better off than herself in a good hotel, which she probably considered a real break, since Annie had a whole bunch of kids.
So you get the general picture, right? Classy lady, poorish, but well regarded by her associates; hard working, decent, having the self-respect to behave and dress well enough to hold a job where deportment and appearance counted. Maybe you’ve known a few Annies in your time; maybe you are an Annie, at least in many respects.
Now, there are probably people who think there is some glamour in being able to wait on the wealthy and celebrated, in a well-regarded and generally upscale hotel. But it has its downside. People who are wealthy, especially people who grew up wealthy, often reserve their good manners for each other. For the hired help, not so much. The sort of hotel at which Annie worked has its slow times and its busy times, and when dealing with the upper crust who deem themselves worthy of instant service, busy times can be pretty tough. I was reading only today how many times there have been riots at Inaugural Balls; it seems once the Prez has come and gone there is such a crush at the coat check table or window, that the police have been called on a number of these occasions. This is nothing new; Lincoln himself lost his hat in the crush at President Taylor’s Inaugural. But I am digressing.
An interesting side-effect of inherited wealth is that it allows people, who would be kicked to the curb in a society based on individual merit, to prosper and thrive and to lord it over persons whose shoes they are unfit to shine. One busy night after a social event elsewhere, just such a lout came to finish a drinking bout, already very far along, at the hotel where Annie worked. As the evening progressed Annie was kept hopping in order to keep the drinks supplied to one and all of the revelers. When this lout ordered yet another drink and was unhappy with the speed at which it was forthcoming, Annie told him, “I’m hurrying as fast as I can.”
Shock! Consternation! How dare she give him what he called “this shit”?!
The lout’s name was of course William Zantzinger, and Annie’s name wasn’t really Annie, it was Hattie Carroll. You may have heard of her. Old Willie, of course didn’t have to take that shit; while Ms Carroll, of course, did. So Good Old Willie did what anyone of his ilk would do in such desperate straits – he raised the toy cane he had brought with him (Good Old Willie – always up for a laugh!) and gave Ms Carroll a good belt with it. Within hours Hattie Carroll, mother of eleven, was dead from a stroke brought on by the stressful encounter, and –oh yeah - the assault with the cane. The court recognized and ruled that the assault was a cause and Ms Carroll’s death its effect at Good Ol’ Willie’s trial .
Nearly all of us who recognize Ms Carroll’s name do so because Bob Dylan wrote a song about it the year it happened. I heard this song – probably the same year or the next - and knowing nothing of the events chronicled, I assumed this was an event that happened in the late 1800s or early 1900s. I was shocked a few years ago to hear that it happened in 1963, at a time when I was living about 35 miles from where the event occurred. William Zantzinger was three years older than me – at the time of the murder he was 24.
There may be those – in fact, there were those, including the judge at his trial – who would note the occasion, the booze, the man’s age and think, “Unfortunate, but the boy was young (the judge’s word was “immature”), bad things happen.” Drink was, in those days, an excuse for much – just six years later my brother would be mowed down by a drunk driver who was barely fined. So let’s just accept for the moment, that logic (horribly wrong though it is) and see if Old Willie led an otherwise upright life, giving to the poor, visiting the sick, comforting the dying. Well, um, not exactly.
You see, years later, Old Willie was renting a whole bunch of substandard housing to poor Blacks. And by substandard, I don’t mean the walls weren’t as smooth and well-painted as one might wish, but rather that there was no heat and no running water. And make no mistake, Maryland gets mighty cold in the winter. And folks, even when they are poor and black, do need their water now and again. Like, to survive. And being the inherited-wealth-made man that he was, Old Willie saw no reason he should be paying taxes on the money he got from the renters. The state, which had been remarkably forgiving in the matter of Ms Carroll (more on that soon), was far less so when it came to getting its cash. So the shacks and the land they sat upon were taken from Old Willie; he no longer had any more claim to them than do you or I.
Well, this never bothered Old Willie; he just kept right on collecting the rent and even more egregious, he hauled any of the tenants who fell behind into court, and had them evicted. Maryland being what it is, and white courts being what they are in many areas, the courts there just assumed that those damn blacks owed Mr. William, and that no one of Mr. William Zantzinger’s pedigree (and race) - Mr. William whose roots went back to earliest white Maryland settlers - would ever do other than tell the whitest of truth in court as he set about teaching the underclass folks a much needed lesson.
Eventually, one way or another, the matter got into the press – not so much because black folk were being put out onto the street but because of the conditions in the housing that they were being put out of. Those looking into the matter soon noted that Old Willie hadn’t owned the housing in question for years, despite his collecting rent and instigating evictions. I do not know whether or not he was paying taxes on this land he didn’t own, but at a guess, I’d imagine he’d figure why should he pay taxes on land he didn’t own, particularly when he saw no need to do so when he did own it.
The court presumably found this fraud three times more heinous than the murder, since Good Ol’ Willie’s sentence for this latter peccadillo ran three times as long; even more painful I am sure, Ol’ Willie had to cough up $62,000 this time.
At any rate, when the court recognized at the trial which resulted from Ms Carroll’s killing that the cause of her death was indeed the assault by William Zantzinger, it rumbled and frowned very sternly and sentenced him to six months in jail. The jail term was, however, delayed and did not begin until a couple of weeks later, because Mr. Zantzinger needed to get his crop in. Mr. Zantzinger could not afford Hattie Carroll an extra minute to do her job; however the court saw no problem in affording Mr. Zantzinger a couple of weeks to do his. What Mr. Zantzinger specifically said as he struck the blow that killed Ms Carroll, after she had the temerity to plead that she was working as fast as she could, was, “I don’t have to take this shit from a nigger.” So y’all use that word as freely as you want: claim it means ‘friend’ or that you can spell it with an ‘A’ or pronounce it differently, or say, “I am just quoting what so-and-so said”, or it’s OK, because I am Black and I am taking ownership of the term, or whatever you like. But please, when you do, admit at least to yourself, that by doing so you acknowledge and agree that you are seconding the opinion that the life of a working mother of eleven children is worth six months at most, to be served when convenient. Because that is what, among other things, you are saying. Mr. Zantzinger’s sentence for the killing was handed down on August 28, 1963.
Do I hear anyone saying, “Hmm… August 28, 1963; that’s seems so familiar somehow. Where have I heard that date mentioned?” I hasten to enlighten you. On August 28, 1963, Martin Luther King made the “I have a dream” speech to a crowd of more than 200,000 people, most of them black.
Virtually every news account at the time noted that the crowd was “orderly”. 10 มกราคม Sticking to my StoryI have heard (way too many times) that everyone has a story, and lately I have been thinking that it's true, although not in exactly the sense that is usually intended by that statement. I think one's story covers much of one's life and is told mostly to oneself. Others may guess at, but never really know the narrative arc; we are either too embarrassed by some parts, or we take for granted that everyone's hoped-for outcome is the same and, of course, it is not. Many people often assume that when a tale is told, everyone wishes to be the prince or the princess in the tale, but this is not true. Many people want to be the wicked stepmother or the big bad wolf; I don't mean it just ends up that way, but that they semi-consciously want it to be thus. There are those of us who think Red Riding Hood (or Cinderella or the Prince) is a dope. This is the reason that a lot of cautionary tales fail of their object. I recall seeing, when in high school, a film called "High School Confidential" which starred Russ Tamblyn as a boyish-looking undercover cop who enrolled in a high school to track down a drug ring there (this was well before every high school was a major drug distribution point). There was the usual complement of hot cars and busty blondes, and the trail even took Russ to some kind of night spot where a beatnik chick was giving a deadpan recital of some poem that had verses each ending with some version of "Let's live it up tonight; tomorrow's going to be a drag." In one scene at a pool-side party, some girl freaks out and we see a close up of needle tracks in her arm. The general sense was that this girl's tale was told; she was pretty much a goner (I forget if she dies or not - it's the same either way). And of course, this being the 50s, all the dopers ended up in jail. I loved the film - I felt I had stumbled into a dark seductive underworld far removed from what then seemed my ho-hum life on a rural farm attending a nearby 50s uber-suburban high school. Before that film I had never heard of marijuana - few of us had - and I was only vaguely aware of the differing types of dope: heroin, coke and the like. I left the theater with a burning desire to get me some marijuana (at least) and damn quick. Only the fact that I hadn't the least clue where, or if, such could be had within 300 miles kept me from scoring that very day. The thing is, it wasn't the blondes or the hot cars that attracted me, or even the beatnik club - though that had its allure. No, the fierceness of my desire to leap headfirst into the world of drugs was because I wanted to be that girl. Not the gender part, the dead-end part. It seemed so cool to be lost so young. The whole cult-worship of Marilyn, James Dean, Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix, Janis, Kurt Cobain - even John Lennon, lies not so much in their talents or attractiveness - as in their early demises. People do enjoy those folks' work, but then lots of people are talented. There isn't a cult-like following for, say, Paul McCartney or Meryl Streep or Dustin Hoffman because they are alive and getting older, and I doubt there will be after they leave us. Fans yes, cult no. The same cult-like feeling appears to have existed for many years among devotees of the poets Keats, Shelley and Lord Byron who died at 25, 30 and 36 years of age respectively. There is something about the magnificence of the gesture of throwing away so much talent away. Or maybe prodigality is a better word than magnificence. There are masses of folks whose idea of a wonderful way to go through life is college, marriage, 2.5 kids, career and retirement with a generous income, or some version thereof. The fact that an outsider cannot tell the story of one of these lucky folks from another is an attraction, not a repellent. And I guess they are probably happy enough in the main. To these people it probably seems perverse, if not unbelievable, that there exist a bunch of folks who feel otherwise. But the fact is that while 99% of people can look at a bad outcome and think, "How sad!" or "How awful!", there is that one percent who look at the same thing and think, "Cool!'. I don't say this is right or sensible or better; I do say that it is so. Whenever you hear somebody start a sentence with, "Nobody wants...", you are hearing someone who has not been paying attention. This is completely beside the point of what I started out to say. What I want to say is that I think each person has a sort of inner narrative of not only how how his life should be, but of how it has been. Internally each person has some kind of answer to the question, "What kind of person are you?" - Not a one word answer, but a whole story. I remember once asking a guy how many times he had seen "Thunder Road" in a therapy setting, and he was thunderstruck, since it was his favorite film, but everything in the guy's attitude and behavior made me think of that film. Still I haven't got to the point that I have been thinking about lately, which is that a lot of people, especially in these days of medical miracles, outlive their story. I suspect the majority of folks in nursing homes have done so, even if they are fully alert and cheerful and enjoy outings to local points of interest. So, too, have plenty of folks outside nursing homes, some of them fairly young. I am pretty sure my story ended some time ago; in fact I can narrow it down to the day if I look it up - it was in February 1996, the day I got on the plane to return to the U.S. from Saudi. That I was leaving Saudi was not the point; what I was leaving at the same time was something that I have had long before I ever went there; the belief that I would do, or was doing something interesting. When my high school teachers talked about careers and stuff like that, it never entered my head they were talking to me. I fully appreciated that I needed to learn what was being taught, and in the main I liked what I was learning well enough; I used to like learning things. But it was all because I had no idea what might come in handy, or when it might do so. I expected to use my knowledge in a MacGyver sort of way more than a Steve Jobs or Jack Welch sort of way. While my teachers, who were mostly terrific people, failed to impart to me any suspicion that I would have some sort of career path, they did, unfortunately, manage to convince me - surely unintentionally - that there was no such thing as a career doing what I liked, or even was good at - English, discerning patterns of behavior, getting along with the oddballs, writing, performing, getting along in "backward" areas, getting out of tight spots. I have thought that my personal malaise of the last 13 years was because I had lost Tumwell, didn't have a significant other in my life, was losing my attractivenenss - such as it was; was losing a host of those folks my age and older whom I had known all my life. And all of this was true as far as it went. But none of those things played much part in my time in Saudi; I got home only once a year so I was pretty much on my own as far as many of these things went, yet my time in the Kingdom was a part of my life which felt fully engaging and vital and exciting. I read somewhere that to recover from loss of a loved one it takes one year for every two years the relationship lasted. This is not to say that one mopes that long, or is in deep mourning, but one has still not completely come to terms with the loss. I am more and more inclined to believe this is true. So I have putting down the lack of connection I feel to my life for 13 years to the triple whammy of losing Tumwell and my brother Gary, to whom I was in many ways closest among my siblings by the simple fact he was closest to me in age, and to leaving the relatively interesting life I was living in Saudi. But there have been periods before when I felt a certain unhappiness, yet there was always a feeling that I was in a temporary lull. I have been thinking I missed having someone special in my life, that maybe things would be better if I found someone; yet I never really feel that I have someone dazzling out there as were Tumwell or Mustafa, or to some extent, Babu. I felt like I would settle for a reasonably attractive companion; I couldn't replace Tumwell and wouldn't try. I expected to feel better, but not terrific. After all, I am older; I don't bring that much to the table (among attributes that I consider important); my partner would be settling for less just as would I. This even led to my entry a week or two back mentioning the offer from my old pal Tiko to join up in perpetual servitude with him. It was this offer, in fact, that has jogged me into a growing awareness of what actually is wrong. Much as I mourn the many people and places which have gone from me, the core issue is that my story seems to be over. I miss my life. Once one's story ends, one is merely waiting to die. This doesn't necessarily mean one is miserable - when I was in school I was was always waiting for summer, but I nonetheless enjoyed spring. If I want to retire, to pay my house off, to have a sexual partner - well, Tiko offers me all of that. And although I may not have made this clear, I am not really tempted all that much by his offer to contribute to any of those things. There was something in our conversation that I didn't really focus on at first, but which has steadily grown in my mind to become the important point, why an offer I had no intention of considering has remained in my thoughts. Tiko wants me to come and visit him in his country. I think this is the part that niggles at the back of my mind. To go to his country, even if only for two weeks, seems to be what an interesting person might do. The essence of my story in my own mind is that I do interesting things. They don't have to be all that interesting in fact, they just have to seem interesting. I want to imagine someone asking about me, and upon being told where I was, or what I was doing, responding, "He's WHAT???" It is not so much that I want to do what interests me than that I want to fantasize my life as interesting other folks. Not in a sense that they envy me, but in the sense that they can't fathom why anyone would do such a thing. I don't care to go to France or Italy or Ireland all that much because lots of people would do that if they could. I want to go to weird places. My first trip outside the U.S. (other than over-the-border forays into Mexico and Canada) was to Zambia. Partly this was because I had an old roomie there, but the real zing was because nobody goes to Zambia. It just seemed like I had nothing to live up to so long as I simply went there - I didn't have to climb anything, or meet anybody or undergo any particular experience - just going to Zambia was way off most people's charts. I am neither brave nor energetic, I am not even that curious, I just have an intense longing to appear to myself as an interesting person. Very little can happen on a two week jaunt; it is rather pathetic to be limited to two weeks per year of any kind of life at my age. One can hardly hope to be kidnapped by insurgents or eaten by wild animals. But most people don't know that; you say 'Africa' and they imagine the worst. This is not to say I would enjoy being kidnapped or eaten, it is that afterwards I will have been in an interesting situation. Even in the wild luncheon scenario, you have to admit you've never been to a funeral where the attendees discussed the guest of honor's merits as an aperitif. It would be something they'd remember for a while. I hated being in jail, oh so long ago, and I am deeply glad it was for such a short length of time, but I love having been there, if the distinction is clear. It kind of sticks in the memory. Let's face it, the old life needs some kind of kickstart. And that could be it. And then while everyone at work is maundering on about their kids and grandkids and their darling kitten and the umpteenth trip to the casino, or the cruise with all the prepackaged thrills, I can muse on something quite different. It is like having a secret identity. I can sit there thinking, "Yes, I may look like that dork Peter Parker, but..." And I'll have my story back. 03 มกราคม Straws in the windI was just admiring a cardinal which was perched in my leafless lilac bush. I don't know why, but the red seems so much more vibrant in the winter - it is almost neon in its redness. Seconds after I turned away there was a loud thump; either that cardinal or another flew directly into my dining room window. I went out onto the deck and there it was head down, half-buried in the fluffy snow that has fallen in the last day or two. It was still breathing in a panting sort of way, so I pulled it from its snowy hole and lay it on the deck. I hope it will recover, but it was, at last glance, still out cold, but also still panting. I wish there were something I could do to make my windows inviting to the bird-witted without blocking my clear view outside. This self-immolation among my avian friends is getting to be a fad, like Twitter or Facebook, or MSN changing Spaces yet again; and, as far as I can see, as useful to the faddees. I really am kind of wondering if this last week happened at all. Last week when I arrived home in Reedville, there was a foot of snow on the ground, all my bird feeders were empty and it was just above freezing. Saturday and Sunday the temperature rose to the 60s, the snow melted so quickly, helped on Saturday by a deluge of 3/4" of warmish rain that it caused the creek out back to flood 3/5 of my land - rising to a near record high in just a couple of hours. I filled the feeders, marvelled at the green lawns and hedges that extended to waters edge, went back to durance vile in Smallville and this week when I arrived on Friday there was a foot of snow on the ground, the bird feeders were empty and the creek was back where it belongs and the temperature was just above freezing. It was an exactly identical landscape to that which I arrived to find last week. But no, much has happened actually. First of all, the ineffable Bilby is gone from work (http://pastdue.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!148B0A2ECFD36181!1829.entry). He filled a very crucial niche under my last boss and was able to wangle a number of advantages by threats to resign. He has made absolutely no friends in his years at Smallville Solutions, his arrogance, recalcitrance and general buttinskiness are legend wherever two or more of his colleagues gather. He was hugely abrasive and contemptuous of everyone. He badly underestimated our new boss who is quite young, but who is a master at the art of good bosserie. He first threatened to resign at the new boss' accession to a position Bilby believed to be rightfully his. The new boss calmly began seeing to it that others were set to learning many of Bilby's duties, and when, two weeks ago, Bilby once again went into a snit and verbally resigned, the boss put in his papers (which Bilby, of course had no intention of doing), thanked him for his service and wished him well in his future endeavors. The last day came this week; when we were called together and informed of the lad's departure, the boss asked if there were any questions or comments. I asked him, "Who will now correct me when I am right?" A much more horrible change befell my first cousin once-removed. Julie is the middle daughter of my cousin Annie of whom I have written (http://pastdue.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!148B0A2ECFD36181!1935.entry) previously. It seems Julie left work one evening and very shortly afterward another employee also left. While Julie was not yet in her car, the other person got into his car, and not seeing her, backed over her, running over her face. He thought he had run over a snowbank, so he left, dragging her behind him for a distance. Another employee thought he saw something fall out of the back of the guy's truck, and managed to get to him before he made the entire trip home; the something turned out to be Julie. Although she is alive, she is badly injured, her brain swelled inside her skull, she lost the tips of several fingers and she faces a great deal of plastic surgery. 2008 was a worse year for that wing of the family than it was for most of the rest of us, since Annie's sister Betty had a house fire that damaged her old 1816 home so extensively that it had to be pulled down and replaced with one of those new messes that so many of us are forced to live in. One can only hope that 2009 will be a much brighter year for all. No year in which the feckless Bush leaves office can be entirely bad; one could be forgiven for thinking that that fact alone makes this a year of joy and jubilatio. I wouldn't mind seeing an uptick in the value of my retirement fund - enough so that I might contemplating retirement by the age of - oh, say, 90. I just checked and the cardinal, alas, is no longer among the living, though he had managed to change position slightly ere his departure from this vale of sorrows and clear glass. Darn. Oh well, there goes 2009... 01 มกราคม And a New Year Begins...So 2008 is finished, and I am cautiously raising my head to peer warily at 2009, a year which once was planned to be the year of my permanent liberation from work. Not gonna happen, I gather, unless a miracle occurs, or (much more likely in my case) I suddenly take a whim into my head to just go ahead and see what happens. I spent some time yesterday switching all my future 401(k) contributions to go into a stable value fund which made over 4% last year; what I was putting it into previously lost over $7,000 last year.
Mehitabel the Cat used to tell Archy, “There’s a dance in the old dame, yet!” While I wouldn’t exactly put it that way, (the gender’s wrong for starters), I must brag that I have had an offer that I have thus far refused, which would, if accepted, take me away from all this. And how many gents of my vintage can say that? My off-again on-again ‘special friend’ Tiko, has told me that if I were to agree to become his One and Only, he would not only pay off my mortgage, but pretty much keep me in the manner to which I only wish I had become accustomed. This is no idle threat, for Tiko is currently experiencing a decidedly upward ride on Fortuna’s Wheel. The new government in his homeland is headed by a personal friend of his and he is back in that unfortunate land dusting off old deeds on the 200-plus properties he inherited from the family holdings; each of his brothers has inherited a similar amount. The revolutionary government is gone, and the good times are apparently rolling once again. He has already leased out a couple of holdings, receiving enough to completely pay off his mortgage in the U.S. – a mortgage which was a good deal larger than my humble debt.
I wrote a couple of years ago about the downside of the Tiko relationship, and for those of you who can endure two of these overlong entries in a day, that entry can be found here: http://pastdue.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!148B0A2ECFD36181!1407.entry. (My good pal Jeankfl told me the right way to do a reference, and I can't find her instruction anywhere.) After reading this, anyone with a modicum of sense would ask, “Why are you even talking to that guy?
Well, a funny thing happened on the way to the grave, as is sometimes the case. I endured years of stalking, invective, and – let’s be honest - mind-boggling sex. A main motive in going to Saudi was to get to a place where Tiko could not follow. Tiko’s own circumstances fluctuated wildly for years; he would one day be owning or renting a fantastic house, the next day out and broke and barely getting by. He had no sense whatever of reasonable financial practices. I believe that when he paid a utility bill, it came as a complete shock that next month they wanted more money. His plans were always based on everything going exactly right. And they never did. One thing that kept him going was that he has always had a host of men dazzled by his looks, and his air of being a shy, valiant immigrant in the grip of misfortune, and these were happy to help out in the hope of getting themselves a piece o’ that. This is still true, even though he has reached 50, and as Shakespeare warned us, every fair from fair sometime declines.
He was never lazy; he always had a job at which he worked hard; it is just that he didn’t grow up surviving on the paltry sum he could earn, and he just has no idea of how to do so. He keeps his house very neat and is far more prone to clean and cook than I am. He never dodged the hard stuff, in terms of effort involved. He is just convinced that he should have what he wants, and if he can’t afford it, then someone should get it for him – usually me.
Anyway, around the year 2000, I finally had enough of the harassment; the side benefits just didn’t equal the stress. I had consulted over the years with a number of people who deal with this sort of thing, and the consensus was that in cutting this kind of tie, the person being harassed only gets killed 10 per cent of the time. Who could resist odds like that?
So one day when I was receiving one of his interminable harangues via telephone – he lived in California and I had just bought my house in New York and was living there, I just laid down the phone and walked away. Now, the last time I had hung up on him years before, he was so enraged that he came and broke through a plate glass window with his bare hands to get at me, and the police had to be called. So this was a real laying down of the gauntlet. As it was, this time all he did was fill my answering machine with enraged threats and accusations. I never answered the phone again when he called and he stopped calling; then I got various jobs in Massachusetts, Ohio, Wisconsin and Alabama and for some years, I never heard a thing from him.
During those years he underwent some life-changing events. He had not two, but three hip replacements – his medical smarts, when picking a doctor, were no better than his financial acumen. His closest friend, on whom he depended a great deal, was diagnosed with cancer and Tiko wound up being the person who had to undertake the responsibility in that friendship for a while. Probably most devastating to his self-image was a botched side effect of the long and unusually painfully series of surgeries on his hips – a catheterization miscue - caused extensive damage to an area very central to many men’s self-regard. Tiko finally experienced the sensation, heretofore known only to mere mortals, of feeling physically imperfect.
One day in Alabama, when I was bored and ripe for mischief – about the same time as I began blogging – I tapped into a former e-mail address and discovered an old friendly e-mail from him sent during our long hiatus. I wondered what would happen if I said, “Hi” – never let it be said that I did not have some complicity in the long relationship that had preceded my decision to brave his threats and walk away from his angry phone call. One thing led to another; I learned he had relocated to a small city in Nevada, and heard for the first time about all the surgeries – even the botched business, which I am certain he would confess to no one else except possible the friend with cancer. He said he had accepted that we were not in a relationship, but he would like to be friends. We met in Reno a couple of years ago and, indeed, it seemed that in his forties, Tiko finally had grown up in many respects and was no longer the over-aged demanding teen-ager that I had known for so many years. We got on well, had a nice time together, and despite the physical alteration caused by age and the worst efforts of the medical profession, he still was hugely attractive to me – and I to him. We have met several times since: he has visited me in both Smallville and Reedville. There have been disagreements, but none of the threats and so on – one could say they remain well within the normal range of behavior.
So we remained friends with benefits. Tiko is intensely aware of the dangers of casual sex, and I am fairly confident that I have been his only outlet in that direction for some time; (his embarrassment over his surgery mishap, which is esthetic rather than functional, is probably even more compelling as a motive to discretion). Meanwhile, the government back in his homeland changed and his fortunes have been steadily rising. He has made a couple of long visits home, and some of the things he has done there lately imply a good deal of money to spend. And as I said, he has fully paid off his mortgage in Nevada.
Then, before he left for his latest visit home a month or so ago, he told me that if I would agree to enter a monogamous relationship, our fortunes could be joined; he’d pay off my mortgage and so forth. But don’t worry, he said, I’ll still want to have sex if you say no. (I told you he was lousy as a negotiator, didn’t I?) He is thinking of living primarily in Africa, with several visits per year to the U.S. – he has no plans to give up his citizenship here, or his home in Nevada. He has a place on the beach in his homeland, among the many other parts of the country to which he has a deed. I demurred, and before he left he informed me he had found a new bf who would join him for a couple of weeks in Africa and who would be the lucky recipient of all his love and worldly goods.
Since his return to Africa, he has called me several times; the new bf has come and stayed his promised two weeks and has returned to the U.S., but will return in May. You missed your opportunity, he told me. I do not know exactly how Tiko thinks, but I do know how he behaves. First, he has that line of thinking through and through that sex is sinful outside a relationship, and worse, a kind of weakness. All of his harangues against me in the past have been centered on my refusal to make him the sole recipient of my affection and lust. I am almost certain that the new bf isn’t getting any; Tiko has in the past kept hopefuls dangling for years with the implication that maybe he’d come across one day, but I am 99% sure he never has. Second, this bf is a relatively new name in the list of his admirers and I am almost certain he would not so quickly allow the lad admittance to survey the physical damage he has endured. Moreover, with his insistence on monogamy and the heavy importance he places on is own behavior in this regard, I can’t imagine he’d continue to want to see me or even to talk to me if he had indeed transferred his affections.
I know that, as much as I genuinely believe in the change I have seen in the last several years, all bets are off if I agreed to enter a relationship. I had a straight friend who was a great guy as long as he dated a woman, but who became a whole different person toward women who entered into a relationship or marriage with him, jealous, suspicious and controlling. I don’t want to re-open that can of worms. I have no pride or complaint about living on the largesse of another (much of which would be no more than my due, since the shoe was on the other foot for a long time). But I know the demands that I be not only monogamous – not much problem, there, at my age – but also divest myself of friends and family would soon follow. And that I will not do, especially since Tiko and I have almost zero in common other than our enjoyment of each other carnally. And he would be suspicious even were I to be as virtuous as Caesar’s wife. He never reads, likes soap operas and gossip about HIS friends and we just have nothing to talk about except my failings. (OK, I might mention his failings once in a while, but only under the greatest of pressure, and only in the interests of mutual improvement! - As if…)
So I am not really tempted. It is just when I look out at this 7-degree weather and think of that place on the beach near the Equator; when I face another day alone and remember how very hot he can be, when I feel old and recall that he absolutely cannot see any change in me from the day we met; when I know I must rise tomorrow and endure another day at work in which I have no interest and to which I see no end; well, it does give one food for thought. If he were only a little more tolerant of the other folks in my life – but he isn’t. If only he were a little more affectionate outside of the bedroom – but he isn’t. If only I had a little more trust in his ability to keep living within his means – but I don’t.
He wants me to come visit this year, and I am toying with the idea. I am well aware I would be on his turf. While I do believe that people can grow, I don’t believe they change fundamentally. I’d visit him in Nevada without a qualm, but in a place where he has powerful friends, and where I am just a foreigner, I am not so sure. I have zero fear of Africa itself – I always do fine in places like that – and I have been to other parts of the continent before; the issue is Tiko himself, and the power that venue may give him in our nearly 30-year push-and-shove.
So I guess 2009 need not be entirely boring… 27 ธันวาคม Christmas, the Art ofWell, the worst of Christmas is behind us, and everyone is scooping up twenty-five cent leftover poinsettias and the like, and getting down to the true meaning of Christmas at the malls, with that Bethlehem thing safely out of the way. One hopes one need not hear Jingle Bell Rock or Rocking Around the Christmas Tree or I'll Be Home for Christmas ever again, but one will settle for 11 months without them. I'm not being a grouch - I like the old reliables - especially O Holy Night, and amongst the modern stuff, Drummer Boy, and even (kind of ) Silver Bells. Christmas was nice; I spent the day with those ragged remains of family left in the area at the new home of my niece, Gary's daughter Megan, in a small village an hour east of Reedville. They just purchased a lovely home on Main Street there, built in 1896, which the original builder never lived in because his wife, who must have belonged to one of the drearier Protestant cults, thought it was "too fancy". To my eye, it is no more fancy than is typical of a middle class home of that era, when it seemed nothing could be built that wasn't beautifully done. Each room of the downstairs has an oak floor with an inlay of different design around the edge - no two alike, and there is a beautiful, though not extravagant staircase, with a closet beneath it in case Harry Potter needs a place to stay. A previous owner had painstakingly removed all paint and restored all the woodwork to natural oak, and it has a wonderful homey feel - just the place for a Christmas. Best of all, the place is as snug as can be - when we lit the fireplace (which has a gas insert), they had to reduce the thermostat which was already set at 62 to a lower temperature because it made things too warm. My house, which was built in 1968, and probably is roughly the same size in square footage, immediately offers to the gods of outdoors any amount of heat I can stir up; a thermostat setting below 73 leaves me scrambling for a sweater. Yesterday, which was Boxing Day in Britain, and What-Were-They-Thinking Day in the USA which likes its Christmases long, commercial, and finely tuned to the our material wants, I spent with my nephew Sebastian. We went to see Milk, for which we had very great hopes, since both of us are among Harvey's People and both lived in San Francisco for long periods of our lives. One huge treat for me was right at the beginning, where they were using vintage footage of Castro Street and for a moment focussed on the exterior of a hair salon place yclept The March Hair that once existed just off Market Street right by the Castro Theater. This shop was co-owned by a very good friend of mine named Steve, and was where I used to get my hair cut and catch up on what was in and what was out. Steve knew everyone and everything that was afoot, and even had his 15 minutes of fame in an odd sort of way. Steve's room mate when I met him (it was never clear to me whether they had been, or were, lovers) was a fellow named Fred, who was an artist that actually made his living at art. This was astonishing to me, for I had gone to high school in the Age of Sputnik, when the schools I knew had made it plain that art and music and theater and the like were hobbies, and that those of us who would make it to college would be engineers, scientists or other practical types. Some of Fred's methods of making a living at art would not pass muster with nuns of the sort Meryl Streep so accurately portrays in Doubt, but they were effective. Fred frequently seduced buyers into making purchases, one might say, in a manner that had little to do with the art itself. Steve loved art of all kinds, and even collected a few drawings I did, since, yes (he said humbly) I can draw a pretty nifty likeness of folks when I try- or I could; I haven't tried it for years. If I may digress a moment here: One of my proudest - or most gleeful - moments was when an artist friend of Tumwell's who had been living in Ecuador for quite a spell, - and who loathed me, a feeling that was mutual - came to visit and spotted a portrait of Tum on our wall, and asked with evident admiration, "Who did that?" and had the grinding humiliation of finding that it was I who had so drawn his attention, and that he had betrayed approval. Oddly I can only draw people I like - then it seems like my hand can feel the shape of their faces when I work. I think Fred's work, at least some of it, did have merit (although likely not as much as he believed), and once he got a showing at - if I remember correctly - the University of California in San Francisco, although it may have been somewhere else like that. Unfortunately, two of Fred's frequent motives (that's the real plural of motif, folks) were religious icons and naked people, especially men to whom he tended to append extremely, nay, impossibly, large - um - equipment at full salute. It was the early '70s and everyone (it seemed), was totally open to, and totally adult about, art of a Mappelthorpian nature, at least in San Francisco. Three of Fred's displayed paintings were of a naked/religious nature, and there was equipment a-plenty pointing in all directions. Some woman, twenty years ahead of her time in her militant religiosity, took spraycan in hand and defaced the three paintings. Jesus, she felt, would have wished her to do so. To the poignant question, abbreviated in these texting days to "WWJD?" her answer was "Graffiti, and lots of it!". Fred had used as a model for Adam in a near-life-size painting his friend and roomie, Steve. Steve had the perfect look of the 70's - think of any of the hair band guys - thin to the point of gauntness, long silky blond hair and an angular face with the bones visibly shaping interesting planes of light and shadow. Although Fred stylized his human figures extensively, this was recognizably a portrait of Steve (and if I do say so, a really fine specimen of Fred's work). Fred was not slapdash; his work was meticulously wrought, with great detail and enormous amounts of time and craftsmanship put into it. Anyway, this defacing was a tale of human interest that piqued the interest of the enormously popular San Francisco columnist of the day, Herb Caen; it had all his favorite elements: currency, naughtiness, and an element of in-the-know; and he tracked down Steve and asked the question that was foremost in the minds of all of that portion of San Francisco which lay south of Market and was bounded by Dolores and Twenty-Fourth Streets and Twin Peaks: "Was the depiction accurate?" Of course this question was by way of a joke and a leer; for not only John C. Holmes, but Man O' War and Seabiscuit would have blushed for shame if forced to compete in the area to which ol' Herb was clearly referring. Steve was quoted as replying, "Oh, Fred tends to exaggerate sometimes" The story ended happily for Fred, as things tended to do before he was swept away in the tsunami that was AIDS. The University, or whoever, had either insured the showing or was deemed liable - I forget which, and Fred got top dollar as well as that publicity which in these parlous times equals talent in the public mind (if one may use 'public' and 'mind' in the same sentence with a straight face). So for those of you who are brave enough souls to see Milk, if you look slippily right at the beginning when the shopfront of the March Hair is briefly shown, you can see a non-priapic example of Fred's artistry, since Fred did all the stained glass and decorative work for the shop. Being somewhat documentary in format, the film was not to me exactly gripping in the way that some films are, but the performance of Sean Penn is breath-taking - there is not an iota of that thuggish machismo he so often displays, and yet he nuances the 'gay' behavior of Harvey Milk so finely, there is at no point the element of caricature that usually attends a straight guy 'acting gay'. It is a tour de force without any question. And, man, by all the evidence provided therein, he must be a great kisser! I lost track of Steve, which I regret, because he was a good friend. It was another case of supposing that I would run into him again and then not doing so, which is what happened to most of my friends. I know he outlived Fred (they had long since ceased to be room mates), but I would not be surprised if he, too, fell victim to the plague - indeed, I would be mildly surprised if he didn't. Not because he was particularly promiscuous - I don't know, really, if he was or not - but because if one does run into someone one knew from Castro Street in those days and asks the whereabouts of a mutual friend, the format of the question is always, "Is so-and-so still alive?" This is a question it would never occur to me to ask of someone in my generation from any other venue. So it looks like the spraycan lady not only was ahead of her time in her iconoclasm, but that, in fact, she wins. 07 ธันวาคม UniqueWhile not as sick as a horse, I was sufficiently sick – let’s say as sick as pony – to quail at the thought of a 2.5 hour drive to Reedville to a house that – let’s face it – is not kept as warm by my brother George, who pays the heat bills – as one might wish. Moreover the weather people – the forecasters, not the radical underground group – were suggesting that the drive back might be unpleasant, and as I gaze out my window, I can only think they might not have erred in this prediction.
Since I, sadly, am not one to ‘get ‘er done’, nor one with infinite – or even any – inner resources, a weekend in Smallville where I know no one, is a weekend of sitting slack-jawed in front of a screen of some sort. However, even I have my standards in viewing what the great screen offers, and Saturday found me watching – as the least of 130 evils, a series of HGTV makeovers, home improvements and general messing about with furniture, paint and power tools. And whereas a couple of years ago I had reason to complain of a universal desire among the shows proffered to have the paint, furniture, and general décor to “pop” , the word du jour these days is ‘unique’ incorrectly used to mean rare or unusual. For those of us who speak English and who blanch at the idea that one thing can be one-er of a kind than another thing, this would be grueling enough; but when, in fact, the one thing that the various designers and clue-free home-owners want to avoid at all costs is anything which hints – even obliquely – that said homeowner (or designers) have a single thought that is not shared by even the dimmest of the general public, it is painful to hear this word applied to the projects.
“We shall start,” declares the designer, “by brightening up the room with a bold color-choice,” and he or she proceeds to paint the place a whitish-yellow color that is barely distinguishable from the off-cream color that has adorned every apartment in every one of those cracker box complexes that specialize in providing more rules than space, in which I have had the spiritually deadening ill-luck to have been forced to dwell. Upon arriving at the home to be “re-made”, the decorator will have his or her attention drawn to the sole manifestation of a previous owner’s individuality or interests; “What were they thinking?” he or she will squeal. What these shows are touting as “unique” is pretty much the same exact thing found in every new house or apartment, but done either better, or more quickly or more cheaply. I suppose, in a society that has no concept of the word “home”, but which frankly discusses property values and resale value where once people spoke of warmth and continuity and love as the chief components to be desired in a domicile, this pablum conformist mentality is no surprise.
It is bad enough that so many people claiming to value their ‘difference’ wish to be as different from others as a single Lego block is to the rest of the box, but what is infinitely worse is these same people’s enraged reaction when they actually are exposed to a dash of real difference in their community. Paint your house purple and you will make the local news, if not the national news on a slow day. On this same morning of dispiriting home improvement, there was a half hour show on improving the grounds of a rather grand house that had been sitting unoccupied amidst one of those housing projects made up of other rather grand houses of fairly similar appearance, designed to imply the owners have a great deal of wealth, and an utter lack of imagination. The prior owners of this house had apparently spent around six figures trying to construct a rather Romanesque water-park type of structure in a steep back yard. There were pillars and stone slides and a cement cave of some sort and so on. My first thought upon seeing it was, “How cool! It looks like a Roman ruin,” and I began to fantasize what I would do with this, were I to find it in my back yard, and if I had the hundreds of thousands that the new owners clearly had to spend. It would not have been something I would have put in originally (I wouldn’t have thought of it, for starters), because my personal taste is for way less cement and lots more green in my yard. But the horror of the owners – and not only the owners, but the entire community – seemed to be aimed at its unusual look. “Eyesore”, was the common motif that ran through every comment. It was hardly an eyesore, other than in the way that all these pretentious ‘estates’ spread across the once verdant cropland are. But even the head of the Homeowner’s Association was on hand to speak brokenly of what a boon to the community a change to the backyard of this house would be. Let me say right here that Homeowner’s Associations are one of these things I despise with all my being, as I do the current Administration or eating seafood or death by flesh-eating bacteria. Of all the things that are threatening to reduce America to the rank of a third-rate power, the kind of thinking that finds it desirable to extort large sums of cash from homeowners to force people to live in their homes in a manner approved by the most aggressive and least imaginative persons in a community surely takes the biscuit. If you ever catch me moving into any place which requires joining one of these entities, please shoot me or make me eat crab. I thank you beforehand and absolve you of any guilt. Suffice it to say when the gobs of dollars had been spent to improve these grounds, there was a great deal more greenery (as well as tons and tons of cement less imaginatively configured) and amidst all that greenery there was not so much as a leaf or a twig that would occasion a start of pleasurable surprise.
Mediocrity is everywhere, and people are so damn proud of it. It was somewhat shocking to me that one of the areas in which Obama had to brook some criticism was the suspicion that he was guilty of pursuing excellence, or ‘elitism’. Whatever may be said for or against Sarah Palin, it was dismaying that a huge element of her popularity seemed to be that she was ‘just like us’. This was not said in order to extol her humanity or her common touch or her awareness of the trials of the common man, but rather her (imagined) thinking and behaving just like we do. Then rather unfairly, she was criticized because, when given access to a high-limit credit card or two she went out and bought what at first seemed to be about $150K worth of clothes , but is now looking closer to $200K. But wasn’t that just like us? Isn’t that behavior EXACTLY what we all did to wind up in our current mess? So why is it we want leaders that are ‘just like us’ and then complain when they prove to be, well, just like us? Personally, I would prefer someone smarter than me, who had a clue how to behave differently from us and could get us out of this mess. Call me eccentric. 27 พฤศจิกายน Unto CaesarI was driving up to Reedville (I just made a mis-stroke and it made me realize that Reedville is an anagram of Deerville - nothing could be closer to the truth. While my co-workers - hunters all - are bemoaning their inability to find the beasts, this morning I counted seven and saw some more I couldn't make out clearly, prancing across my backyard looking for my most valuable shrubbery to destroy) - anyway on this drive I found myself behind a vehicle with a new and different version of that silly fish that people in large numbers affix to their cars. My favorite version is the one I call 'drunken Jesus' because it has a cross where the eye would be, just like the old cartoons of Dagwood and his ilk had in the Sunday comics when they indulged not wisely but too well. I wonder they don't place a whirl of stars around the poor fish's head. (I am also big on the ones which encapsulate the word "ικϑος", and it leads me to wonder who on earth imagines that someone, who cannot recognize a picture of a fish when he sees it, would happen to be fluent in Ancient Greek and seeing the word 'fish' there would be enlightened as to what he was looking at.) Anyway, I fell to musing one how much less annoying the christian cults would be if they actually adhered to those bits of the bible which they seem to ignore: in this case, the bit about not making a show of one's religion. (By the way, that question mark in the fish word should be a theta, but that's what happens when one transfers stuff from Apple to Spaces) There are a slew of folks whom seem to profess great affection for, and belief in, the late J. Christ of biblical fame, and who profess a nearly equal passion for the ideas which the founders of our nation enshrined in the Constitution. So it is perplexing to me - or would be if I had any faith whatever in either the intelligence or integrity of my fellow man - why these same folks have not only a disregard, but a positive disdain, for one well-known principle on which both of these literary efforts agree strongly which is expressed from the mouth of the biblical hero Jesus himself as, "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's", and which shows up in the Constitution as "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" together with the the banning of "prohibiting the free exercise thereof". Leaving aside the context of Jesus' statement - the weaselling out of a tight spot when the issue of financial support for the foreign occupiers of Israel was raised (Well, sir, are you a traitor to your people or to your rulers?), much like any modern candidate might weasel in a debate on a tough issue, we still have a pretty clear maxim on the separation of the secular and the religious. It would seem to me, then, that the state or nation has no business marrying (or divorcing) anybody, since marriage is pretty much a religious exercise with plenty of regulation from any cult worth its salt, mostly based on the pretty fiction that said relationship extends at least unto death and in many cases - enough to stop me cold in my tracks right here - beyond death. What the state does have an interest in is determining rights of property, inheritance, decision-making (medical decisions, for instance) within a legal entity or organization or partnership and so forth. So all this rannygazoo over the various efforts to enable or disable marriage for persons of the same gender seems to be mostly a confusion between what is Caesar's and what is the other guy's. You'd think that one side, at least, would be clear on that. I personally cannot imagine being married or civilly united with anyone, and I have less than no concern whether or not other folks are, or are not, so encumbered. Well, not entirely NO concern, because I do think that children do best with two parents rather than one, and doubly so when it is the same two for the duration of the child's younger years at least. I'll even grant (although I am not really convinced) that it might be better if there is one parent of each sex; however, I suspect that two loving parents of the same sex are still better than one parent, and that any loving parent - whether one alone or one of a pair - is better than none, although I suspect no parent at all is better by several furlongs than some of the cruel and careless parents I have known in my day, both those paired and those single. When no children are concerned, I really see no need for any union whatever, unless one subscribes to the idea that there should be no sex without some treaty of union between the two players. Most sects would make that union marriage; personally I think a pre-nup covers most of the bases (with or without the ensuing nup). With all the marital discord that lands in court and the subsequent eager attempts to savage the children by the two parties who just moments ago were mooning over each other as being the greatest guy or gal on Earth, I see no reason for the law to get involved in anything as messy as marriage. Leave marriage to the various faiths, who are far less filled with the milk of human kindness than any civil court could ever hope to be. No law should ever force any cult into marrying or dissolving the marriage, or banning or condoning the marriage, of anyone. Civil law, for the good of the citizenry, should establish the earliest age at which sexual relations are permissable, since there is good evidence that sex engaged in with someone too young to give his or her informed consent is severely damaging. Let the churches marry off twelve-year-olds - or three-year-olds - if they wish, but let the law also ensure that the sexual aspects of those marriages not begin until the proper age is reached by both parties. I have heard from many of my married friends that a sexless marriage is not exactly a rara avis, so this would introduce no novelty into the world as we know it. Religion rules morals and government rules ethics. Others are free to determine which of these they most want to find in their daily dealings with others, but for me, give me the ethical man in preference to the moral man any day. Laws can be made and unmade by the majority of folks as determined by their representatives; dogma is made by a few and then enforced for all time with utter disregard for changes in circumstances, until it becomes so ridiculously out of touch it dies a natural and welcome death. I know there are still folks who kill a goat or a cow to honor or propitiate some vaporous entity floating in the ether, but I would not care to do so and would hardly find myself joining some gang that wanted thus to express their devotion. The sacrificing of virgins has given way to the killing of girls who are caught becoming non-virgins in some parts of the world (I guess it is progress to move from killing those who have done nothing to killing those who have done something); and in my youth the sequestering or 'sending away', and expelling from school - or society - of female non-virgins who were not wise enough or lucky enough to prevent conception has been reduced these days to forcing the girl to have the kid and raise it - usually unaided by the man (or petrie dish or toilet seat) involved, but then damn few of these groups were founded by women. There are areas that are the concern of both faith and the civil authority, but in surprisingly numerous areas of life one of these two seems to wish to meddle in the sole province of the other. I should think it would be easy enough apply all the legal rights and constraints to any couple who formally enters into a legal union, and deny them to those who do not, whether or not they choose to marry in a church or temple or bath house. Equally, it would be easy to administer whatever sacraments, rites or benefits are claimed to accrue to those who meet the provisions of a faith, and to deny these things to those whom that faith despises, whatever their legal status. Separating these two ideas would be a done deal tomorrow, I imagine, if young women could be convinced that they could have not one but two "Big Days" in which they could indulge all their most extravagant, pointless and mindless fantasies, forcing all who had previously loved or liked or breathed the same air as themselves to take part in mind-numbingly dull exercises and to give them large, expensive tokens of their regard. Speaking of this latter issue, it has caused me no little shame and embarrassment to see many gays piling on that bandwagon of extravagant vulgarity that is the modern wedding. There is, or was, a program on Logo, the gay cable channel, (It was unfortunately not named "You're as Bad as They Are") which followed various same-sex couples through the process of planning their weddings and the ceremony itself. I watched a couple of episodes with that same fascination which used to draw so many to public hangings. I finally could take no more after seeing two lads make a great deal of fuss over choosing a church to marry in. Um, how about the one you attended regularly? And if you did not attend any or if the one you attended refused to marry you, then why a church at all? When I was younger, every wedding reception in my family occurred in the home of the bride. One saw people there whom one actually knew and cared for and with whom one liked to socialize. Poor mama cooked the food (with help sometimes, from others) and perhaps served with it a purchased cake, with a couple of dolls on top. The bills were probably paid off within a year. Since that time I have found very few weddings to be any fun at all, and I have been to a lot of them. More than a few weddings have lasted nearly as long as the marriage, the latter of which topics no one seems to have given much thought to at all. The bride requires her "perfect day" in which she is "the most beautiful girl in the world" (neither of which fantasies came even close to being realized) and the groom requires an occasion to stand tongue-tied and red-faced listening to cliched innuendo and, if he is exceptionally vulgar, to begin the marriage much as he will subsequently end it, by shoving cake in his beloved's face, although frequently the ending facial is provided with something a good deal harder and less sugar-laden than cake. On the issue, then, of gay marriage, I feel about the same as I do about marriage in general: that it should be the province of whatever church or fraternity or social grouping one adheres to, and that the legalities and interests of the legal system should be expressed in some other form of legal contract available TO anyone WITH anyone. Further, since there is general agreement among religions that the main purpose of marriage is to produce children, and as the government pretty much feels that the protection, if not the production of children, is a major concern of their version of marriage or civil union, I believe that any two people, not already bound by an existing civil contract of union, who apply to a government for such union, and who are denied this, should be exempt from any other obligation to children and the parents thereof, notably school taxes (so long as they do not burden the system with ex-contractual children of their own). Folks should be free to go as deeply into debt, and express themselves with whatever degree of vulgarity they deem suitable to celebrate either a religious marriage or a civil union, or both. On the other hand, the battle against gay marriage as expressed by opposition to such proposals as the recent Proposition 8 in California has nothing whatever to do with marriage or civil union, or the protection of these, in any way. Were any of these opponents - especially the Big Three - the Mormons, the Catholics, and the Focus on Families group the least bit interested in the 'saving' or 'sanctity' of marriage, they'd be plowing their cash and influence into outlawing divorce, and since they profess to see both eternal bonding and the will of god in marriage between two people - a single man and a single woman - none of them would permit those who attempted to dissolve this bond or worse, to enter into second and third marriages, to enter their sacred precincts, and would return any donations to the givers when the givers were such people, just as politicians reluctantly return any donations from those with whom they feel sullied to be in league. But I suppose the first law of any Faith is that all money is holy once it enters its coffers; still, a little seemliness, or at least consistency, seems in order. These people are haters of gay people and ought to be open in saying so. These people know very well that these laws will not suddenly compel the married man or woman to leave his or her mate to move in next door with someone of his or her own sex, or in any other way change the rights or relationships of heterosexual married folks. The bullshit about hating the 'sin', but loving the sinner is flimsy and thin and transparently untrue as soon as one examines their treatment of those sinners whom the Big Three of opposition profess to love so dearly. Stripped of all the rhetoric and subterfuge, the opposition to these propositions are nothing more than expressions of distaste and dislike. Moreover, contributions by these organizations to political causes are prima facie evidence that they should not be exempt from taxation, since they have chosen to depart from the principle of keeping the civil and religious separate. This should not be a one-way street; if the churches wish to meddle in the affairs of civil authorities, then those civil authorities should be not only free, but required, to meddle back in the form of audits and taxes. Just thought I'd mention it - oh, and Happy Thanksgivvey. 04 พฤศจิกายน Spreading the WealthSince I paid off the last of my debts with last month's Social Security cheque, and since I have not yet begun to put the subsequent lavish installments of this socialistic boon into the tankless water heating system that I plan to install so that I may at last enjoy the huge built-in "bathtub" (actually it is a tiled drop in the floor that goes down about 30 inches to form a vast rectangular pool) that inspired me to purchase this manse in the first place, I have been indulging in an orgy of spending on extravagant gifts for the only person in my life - moi, as Miss Piggy would say. I seem to have this flaw in my make-up, that "vacation" means to me not only a joyful and soon ended freedom from the slavery of my normal - i. e. working - life, but an equal freedom from any awareness of consequences or even from common sense, which, of course is part of un cercle méchant that usually makes it necessary to extend the foreseeable term of my servitude. However since GWB, in what I had fondly and naively hoped was his last act of malevolent incompetence, has destroyed my retirement savings to the point where a person so averse as I am to a life in a cardboard box under a bridge in the snows of Western New York dining on roadkill must put aside thoughts of retirement and bend my aged shoulders to the laborer's wheel unto the end of this life and possibly beyond if, as my pal jeankfl so ardently and inexplicably believes, there is some divinity floating in the æther who, having been malicious enough to endow us with GWB in the here and now, would additionally inflict eternal life upon us. I used the term 'naively' up there at the beginning of that last meandering sentence, because I pretty much felt that, short of bombing Iran and getting us into a third war (which he might possibly spin that by bombing the land that sits there keeping Afghanistan from smashing into Iraq as merging the current duet of war into a single entity, thus leaving us with 'only one war' - an act of spin that would fit neatly into a universe where a passel of dented and scraped armored vehicles and a blurred photograph of an old feed mill can be spun into Weapons of Mass Destruction) - there wasn't much else ol' George could do to ruin his native land. But then I heard this week (or last - it all flows into a dull nightmare of sameness lately) that the next few months are to be spent using executive directives or departmental revisions of guidelines, or whatever careful of framework of regulations it is that keeps your water safe to drink and ensures that your spouse doesn't remain at work in the mine trapped under a mountain or two of fallen granite, in order to gut existing regulations which business finds onerous; after all, why should Yellowstone just sit there all lumpy and bumpy when it can be smoothed out and filled with poorly made homes? A day without savaging the structure and well-being of the land is a day wasted. I had considered briefly holding off my spending for a week, in order to not rev up the economy and thereby influence the outcome of the election, but last Thursday I downloaded a bunch of songs from iTunes and after paying no less than $40 for the lot, found a message when I tried to move them to my iPod that said iPod was full, and that $37 worth of these songs would not be playing on that treasured but ancient device anytime soon. Well, that was it for me; I was powerless in the grip of such a disaster. Taking a page from GWB's playbook, I said, "Damn the effect on the country," and tore out and bought myself a new iPod, which promises a capacity, instead of that measly thousand songs the old one could encompass, of a tasty 30,000. The physical profile of the slick new device is, of course, such that my old in-car player, which I plug into the cigarette lighter, will not fit it and so I had to purchase a new one. Then it occurred to me that having such a slick new device with its delightful ability to reproduce even the smothered belch of the fat guy in seat Q of row 7 in the audience at the live recording of Mahler's Seventh (if Mahler HAD a Seventh, and if I were ever so refined as to buy something like that), it made no sense to have my music merely broadcast in my car, which, like all Mazdas, is as noisy as jet flight would be, if one were able to ride in a jet with the top down, when there were expensive earphones on the market which blocked ambient sound and faithfully produced the recordings I was going to put into my new iPod even unto that posited belch. Thoughts of the noisiness of my car set me to musing on the fact that it had grown considerably more noisy, producing new and, quite frankly, alarming sounds of late, and in addition that the due date for my annual inspection had just passed; that it is entirely likely that the first state wise enough to ban the use of hand-held cellphones while driving would also have added a rider to the effect that it is equally illegal to wear noise-suppressing headphones while doing same; thus it would be costly to be stopped by the gendarmerie for doing so only to have them discover that I was such a scofflaw as to be driving with expired inspection stickers. I therefore hied me to the nearby inspection station and said grandly (with a lordly wave of my hand), "Inspect it! Fix it!". Well it turns out that the alarming noises were mostly being caused by the fact that these all-purpose tires, which I had put on my car when the virtually treadless wonders that had served me well in Alabama, had proved to be thin reeds upon which to lean amidst the snows of New York, were in the process of disintegration, being wracked with fissured irregularities and uneven spots and god knows what else. "Don't you," asked Brian the service station man, who seems about to become my new best friend, "rotate them?" Well, of course, I have HEARD of rotating tires, but I had no idea that people actually DID it, unless they were fanatic car-ophilic teenagers or the kind of men who have allergies. I mean, don't the damn things rotate thousands of times, every time you drive somewhere? Why would one get flat spots or worn spots in just one or two places; does the wheel leave the ground for a bit on each spin so as to leave less-worn spots, thereby making noise and put me at risk of life and limb? "I have," added Brian in a conspiratorial manner, "a set of studded wheels which someone special-ordered and then never showed up to purchase, which would fit your car. And studs are the best," he added, "for winter driving." "How much would they cost?" I asked. Of course money would be no object - certainly not between such pals as Brian and me - but I felt that such adult attention to detail would favorably impress my new friend. "They would be four hundred and four dollars, if you want them." Brian said (he had already told me the cost of the oil change, inspection and so forth). "Of course, by law, you can only have them put on after November first, and they must be replaced with other tires for summer no later than April 15. And you MUST have them rotated every 5,000 miles, although," (he was eager to save a pal money, and point out the loopholes) "it wouldn't be a real problem if you went to 6,000 miles." "Put 'em on!" I cried. It only occurred to me last night as I was driving my brother George's pick-up back from The Stereo Shop that if these tires were special-ordered, Brian could have meant four hundred and four dollars EACH. And by this time I had already received a ten per cent discount on my new Sennheiser RS140 headphones from another new friend whose name I didn't quite catch, the discount being because the only set in stock was one he had taken home to try out, ("They aren't USED," he assured me, although one wonders why anyone would take the trouble of bringing them home if one were not going to use them). So I start this Election Day with feelings of dread and anticipation. Yes, I worry that my guy won't win - my voting track record includes Goldwater (I was very young), McGovern, Humphrey, Ford, Anderson, Carter (the time he lost) and the like, so my candidate losing is a distinct possibility - but also I worry that I have nullified the advantage of being the only person in this Bush economy who is not worried about losing his job by adding the worry that I may be paying $1616 for a set of tires I must remove in just six months. And then I must go in my car with the new gold-studded tires to pick up my new headphones. "I don't work tomorrow," my new friend in The Stereo Shop told me, "but I'll have my relative bring them in for you so they'll be here when we open." Isn't it kind of odd to say "my relative"? Not "my brother" or "my cousin" or "my great-aunt Charlene"? I'm just asking. On the bright side, all the forecasters say it is going to be an exceptionally gorgeous day, with near-record high temperatures. So if the voting machines break down and I have to stand in line for hours, or if I have to move from my house to a spot under a nearby bridge in order to pay for tires that have a value such that they are priced by the gram weight, I will have spectacular weather in which to do so. I doubt that the lines at the polls will be that long because this is a generally Republican area, and I have never yet heard of a voting snafu in one of those. It would be like running out of cheese at a soiree in Wisconsin. Plus - and I can hardly believe that New York could possibly get things so right - I was watching one of those pre-election shows, where the news guy gets so desperate for something new to say that he starts talking about the 'other' presidential candidates on the ballot and the camera went to close-up of a voting machine and it was the same old type of machine with the pulldown levers on which I cast my very first ballot! The kind that work! (Come to think of it, I really don't recall hearing of voting problems - the mechanical kind, not the blatant fraudulent kind, of which we have had plenty - in New York.) I took time out, in this catalogue of a misspent vacation (using 'spent' in both senses) to call a plumber about installing a tankless water heater. I made certain the man's name was not 'Joe' before I called, since I am sure every plumber in America thus yclept has raised his rates in anticipation of becoming rich enough to join the Republican party. Although I infer from the fact that I went through the 'push one for this, push two for that' routine followed by a 'leave your name and the time you called', that I may have called Chris the plumber, but Chris may be a Joe in spirit. Then I took a minute to see if my car was ready for the trek to The Stereo Shop, but apparently the studs are being carefully inset into the tires by a jeweler of some sort, because the car will not be ready until noon. Anyway, after I left my name and the time I called as bid, I resumed my labor here until it was borne in upon me that the electronic voice had failed to request, and I had failed to give, my telephone number, so I called back and actually got Chris himself; I have an appointment for tomorrow morning before I have to leave for Smallville in my return to servitude. So I can finish my vacation in a flurry of spending that would cause Marie Antoinette to blink. If you all find an uptick in the value of your 401(k) today: well, you're welcome. 19 ตุลาคม NothingIt is odd how there are some things that I have to relearn over and over again. Or, I guess I can say more accurately, I learn them but I never really believe them. Short term lessons I have to learn weekly are such things as that if I buy fresh vegetables - and even sometimes meat - I still will not magically become a person who cooks regularly. One benefit of Tiko's visit which ended yesterday, was that my refrigerator has been purged of a bunch of beets that have been within for the better part of a year and a bell pepper that had more wrinkles than I have, as well as a few other barely recognizable members of the vegetable kingdom. Another frequently occurring example of this innocence or faith or hope or what-have-you is my tendency to purchase books, when at Border's or Barnes and Noble that I really ought to read - versions of the classics or highly regarded recent works of Indian authors or the like, believing that I will this time actually read them, a belief that evanesces and disappears into the æther as I reach my car in the parking lot. I do draw the line, even while still inside the store, at surrealistic Latin American novelists - there is nothing I dislike so much as surrealism in my reading or film-viewing. I was persuaded to attempt One Hundred Years of Solitude some years back when everyone I knew was just loving it, and if I had one hundred years to list everything I hated about it, I would not be able to approach the whole. I want my people, when I am reading about them, to be people and not symbols of some sort of idea or other; I want them to have unique thoughts and reations and to feel, if I ran into them at a rib shop, I'd recognize them. If you can make me think about how people behave, or how history moves individuals, or how changes really impact lives, then so much the better, but first please make me believe that Betsy or Doctor Jones or Mrs. Cranapple is real. It is interesting to me when some bizarre incident occurs in life and an author thinks, "Why would this happen? Why would someone do this?" and then writes a novel inventing a back story. But don't please, give someone a ten-inch thumb, or a third eye or a youth lasting twenty times the norm and then treat these things as unremarkable. Years ago in England a youth blinded several horses in England, a country that is particularly fond of its horses, and Peter Schaffer wrote the play Equus as his idea about how someone could come to do such a thing, and when I saw his play in San Francisco years ago I was blown away. I have not read or seen the film Sophie's Choice, but just knowing the basic conundrum it poses: if you had two children you loved and you could only save one, how would you choose? - I am captured somewhat by its spell - enough to think what I might do. I enjoy action films and novels such as the film Frantic, where the hero is a regular guy who is plunged into a bewildering or dangerous situation, while superhuman heroes like James Bond bore the Hell out of me. What would I do if I were in a foreign country, my wife said she'd meet me in the lobby, left the room a couple of minutes ahead of me, and when I arrived downstairs, she was nowhere to be found, and no one would take me seriously? Or if someone slipped something vital and highly sought-after into my luggage as happens to Will Smith in Enemy of the State?
Actually, I have just wound up demonstrating what I was going to say, because what I was working up to mentioning was another thing I have to re-learn over and over. This is that when I think I have nothing to write about or talk about I often forget that if I sit down and begin to type, I will soon be off on something. Avoiding writing because one has no 'news' is silly - few people want to go back a few entries and read what someone did one day (shopped, met Mark and Lulu. drove to West Wombat?). I like best to read entries where people say what they think about things, how they see things, so long as - god help us all - it is not regurgitated mush from the left or right wing bloviators who seem to pass for intellectuals these days when people who bother with any kind of education seem to hasten to forget anything they learned before they begin to speak or write. I want to hear, not so much what happened, but how it impacted the writer, or his or her friends or family or what it made them remember or think about. I really don't care if you or I or Britney Spears went to the mall; but if any of us saw something new, and it made us try something or think about how it represents either a change or the persistence of the old, or the way the same old thing is repackaged and sold as new, or the gullibility or wisdom of the public or any of a hundred other things, then that will be as interesting six months from now as it is today. I love when someone doesn't throw dear old Mom or Dad or "the baby" into a conversation or essay restating all those trite and boring warm fuzzies that one assumes are associated with each, but rather talks about what was unique about his or her Mom, maybe something even not so endearing, that makes this particular reference unique and thought-provoking. Talk of babies is the worst, because basically they are all alike, unless, god forbid, there is something wrong with them. Nearly any "discussion" of a baby (I hesitate to dignify these parades of cliché with the term 'discussion') makes me think of the press conference Jayne Mansfield gave when she had her umpteenth baby. Ms Mansfield was almost pathological in her pursuit of public attention, and thus had the press in almost before the child had emerged fully, and when asked (the question being an idiocy in itself) how she felt about the baby's arrival, replied - touching all bases, - "Oh, I do think it is so wonderful of the good lord up above to give babies to - to - to mothers!". Um, yes. That surely says it all. I like babies, especially in small doses. I like (most) mothers. There are many things I like. And I don't care to hear about any of them unless the speaker has something new and unpredictable to say. Otherwise send me a Hallmark Card and I'll open it when I need a sugar rush. The breathless reporting to anyone but the spouse and the grandparents of each baby's inevitable progressions is really de trop. On the other hand, the changes in the parents, especially those few parents who don't descend into mindlessness, such as the same men who two years earlier were trying to subvert everyone else's daughter yapping on endlessly about protecting their family (I have never yet heard one of these say, "I get what an asshole I was"), and their wives babbling about "everything" (usually unspecified) being 'different' now that they are mothers, preparatory to making some point on which motherhood or lack thereof is entirely irrelevant. I was just thinking what an improvement in the gene pool could be effected, if the entire world were required to turn in an essay which began with the sentence, "The sun came up this morning." Then all the essays were collected and everyone whose next line was "It was so beautiful" was summarily executed. And everyone who used the word 'hot' in the next line would be required to read the entire works of Barbara Cartland in the next 30 days (unless they used it in a sentence like, "And it revealed a hot babe walking in my direction...). And those who claimed they learned something from Ms C's oeuvre could also be shot or forced to wear pink for life, as a warning that there was nothing to be gained by conversing with them. I am all for mindless entertainment; I read junk a lot, but there really should be a limit. My point is that writing is in many ways like a visit from an old, dear friend or close relative. When one of these calls to announce a visit, we rarely think, "What will I talk about?" When one is truly close to someone, the conversation often wanders over a wide range, sometimes speculative, sometimes reminiscent, sometimes evaluatory (is that a word?) - often all jumbled together, but always interesting to both parties. One writes for that imagined best friend; not for the critical sister that still resents you getting the first piece of watermelon that summer, but for the friend that thinks you are funny and a little bit wise, and just so darn interesting. And when someone is with a friend like that, one tends to become more interesting (well, at least to the friend). And so, today I sat down with nothing to say - and voila! (And don't let me hear you saying, "And that is exactly what you said...) 13 ตุลาคม Catching up, with a semi-happy endingWell, I have an extra day off this weekend, not because of any sudden act of generosity on the part of Smallville Solutions, but because I took one of my meager supply of vacation days to console myself for the growing realization that, thanks to the Katrina-like incompetence of the government added to the utter amorality and greed of every single businessperson above the level of manager in the country, I will probably be working until I am found dead at my desk, which, judging from the blood-pressure-raising rage I feel, may be as early as next Tuesday. People work all their lives to achieve some goal - a nice home, educated kids, a Harley, a cabin in the mountains, whatever, and my goal has been one and only one thing - to retire and never, ever have to get up because I had to go to work, never have to leave the party early because I had to go to work, never cut short my stay in a great place because I had to go to work again. Goals are dreams in today's America and dreams are myth, like the pot of gold at the rainbow's end. Both the pot of gold and the rainbow itself are illusions, and we are meant, like medieval serfs, to work forever for our greedy masters, living our short, brutish lives until we can expire either in some war to gain honor and riches for the nobility or wear out our hearts in one of milord's fields. The one modern enhancement to the servile life since 1100 A.D. has been the improvement of medicine so that we can serve longer and be less happy. Otherwise I don't see a scintilla of difference between then and now; one might say the serfs live more comfortably now, and this is true, but then so do the masters. What pisses me off most is that the jerks that did this aren't jumping out of buildings on Wall Street. What on earth is holding them back? Oh, yeah, maybe those zillion-dollar bonuses. In 1929, the bastards at least had the decency to lose their own money. If some crazed guy or woman, who actually made a reasonable mortgage he (or she) could afford before the job on which he or she depended went bye-bye, and who then lost his or her home anyway because of this debacle, happens to go on a shooting rampage on Wall Street and nails one or two of those bastards, well, let's just say, (s)he can count on an anonymous contribution to his defense fund from Upstate NY. I only ask that he please not shoot the secretaries or the mailroom guys. It is this indiscriminate shooting that gives such rampages such a bad name, when actually they could be such powerful forces for good. The old me, the one who took off on a whim to hitch to California or to fly to Zambia with no money or to take a job in Saudi, seems to be smothered beneath someone new, someone who dreads living in the streets or living on pet food in his old age, yet I do hear his faint whisper in my ear, saying, "Why not retire as planned, and see what happens?" I am not totally wiped out (yet), I have my tiny pension (for now) and my Social Security (thanks to the days when the political class threw an occasional scrap to the peasantry). And my 401(k) - there are three of these, one from each of my last three companies, plus a small IRA and some savings. My thought is I could use up the smaller ones for the first years and hope the bigger ones had a recovery by the time I got to them. And I have no debt other than my mortgage; my house was painted this year, and a new roof was put on last year. "Faint heart," 'tis said, "never won fair freedom". OK, they said, 'fair lady'. but I really am not looking for a lady, fair or otherwise, and I would assume the principle holds true for other desires. We shall see come Spring, when I am most wont to act impulsively. In the weeks that I have been absent from blogamy, I have had a couple of events of note. Aunt Bertha, my last aunt and my Mom's last remaining sister died suddenly. She fell, and when the ambulance folks got her to the local whatever, it was discovered that she had an aneurism or something the size of a baseball (aren't these things - tumors, and so on - always said to be the size of a baseball? Maybe we should adopt shooting BB guns as our national sprt and save a few lives) . So they were about to medevac her to some hospital and she was, as always smoking like a chimney. "Oh," she said gaily to her son Tommy, "I am going to ride on a helicopter!" "Ma, you can't smoke on a helicopter." quoth Tommy. It has been the lifework of her three remaining sons to try and get her to stop smoking. The odd thing is that, like Bill Clinton, she never inhaled. Yet she kept the air around her a dense fog of smoke - she must have actually had to absorb the requisite amount of nicotine, usually done so efficiently by one's lungs, by the twin stratagems of absorption through her tongue and breathing her own second-hand smoke. "Oh, shut up, Tommy!" said Aunt Bertha to her loving son, as she was whirled out of sight. These were her last words to any of her family, and as words to live by, I suppose they are as good as any. The other thing that happened, and this will be of note, I suppose, only to such Shaggers who have been with me from (nearly) the begining of ye olde blogge, since it was way back when, that I mentioned this, was that I found Rob, the guy who cried when I left my surfing life behind me to enter the nut house. He is still living in Southern California, though he surfs no more. After I left, the nightly parties that used to occur at my house on Periwinkle Street were resumed under the aegis of one of the other surfers who took a house not far from there. At one of these parties, Rob met Wendy, and the two have been joined together in unholy wedlock since. They have survived addiction and come out clean, have some kids now grown, and he now works in electronics, a job that gives him great latitude in hours worked, and which he enjoys. I was gratified that he had talked of me so often that Wendy, who never met me, knew who I was the instant she saw got my letter, and called Rob at work. On hearing how far I have fallen from what I used to be, in short, that I was a programmer, Rob said, "I always thought you would be a writer." I can't imagine that he ever saw anything I wrote, but it was gratifying to be reminded that I was once interesting. He also said, "No one ever wanted to learn to surf more than you did." I don't know why, but that warmed my heart a great deal. So we are desultorily in contact, and that growing itch to find him has been scratched. So too, has the small dream that he was pining for me somewhere alone, waiting for me to ride up on a white horse, but I never really believed in that entirely. I am glad he found a soul mate; he was much nicer and kinder of heart than the average guy. And he remembered all the things I remembered, and pretty much remembered them the same way I did; you don't often find that after 40 years apart. The reason I have taken tomorrow off was not to annoy the local Native Americans by celebrating Columbus Day, but because my sort-of-friend Tiko is coming to visit. I set up for him to come Sunday, only to discover too late that the plane that was cheapest on which I booked him was an overnighter and would not arrive until Monday. I have to take off Friday also to return him spent and exhausted to the airport for a return to Nevada. His prospects have been looking up: as I wrote long ago, he fled his country in a revolution that ousted its very corrupt government in which his family was intimately involved (in the government, not the revolution) and has had to live the life of a poor Black man in America since he was 22. Now there is a president in power who is a personal friend to him and his family, and they are recovering some of their vast properties at home. So he may soon get to experience the life of a rich Black man in America, which is sadly rare, I guess, for folks who are neither athletic nor musical. He told me he would have to find a rich boyfriend now, since his father always told him never to marry down (although said father had married up in a big way, coming from a tribal backwater to marry into the wealthiest family in his nation). But our relationship, such as it is, has persisted so long, I doubt I will be pushed aside now. His incredible skill at letting cash flow outward from his grasp is such, that I wouldn't be at all surprised if I had more money than he three years after he gets his claws on the family booty, by virtue of my having nothing at all, but not being in debt. I have procrastinated on posting this, and will do so from my Apple so that I can leave now for the airport. It is a toss-up, usually as to whether i am more eager to see him arrive, or to see him leave when the time comes, since we have nothing in common - no interests, no values. We dislike each other's choice of foods even - he can't stand pasta of any sort, but lives on seafood which i won't touch, and African dishes, few of which i can approach with any enthusiasm. He may never have read a book in his life. We like different music. He has started a blog - a political one, of all things - and we do support the same candidate, but that is an odd congruence of taste in an otherwise utterly disparate world. We dislike, or are bored by each other's friends. Our ideas on what love is or can be are completely different, And yet after 28 years, we have such a passionate physical attachment, it is insane. He still sees the 38-year-old (and I was HOT, if I do say so) he met in 1980 and I still see the skinny 22-year-old African lad with the slanting eyes who dazzled me back then and ever since. Love, no; but something. I must hie me to the airport, it would be unfortunate to have our first fight of many this week, be because I am late. Peace to you all; there is like to be little of that in these parts... 07 กันยายน Pot LuckI HATE potluck dinners. While there are few things nicer than being invited to real dinners where the host supplies the victuals, or having folks over to my house where I do the cooking; a potluck would be better described by substituting the word 'bad' for 'pot'. A man or woman, or a couple, deciding to host his/her/its friends might roll out something special: an upgrade to the meat they usually eat, or a great salad they discovered or a special dessert; but in the midst of the bounty, if the meat turns out to be squirrel or the salad has great slabs of wet bread, or anchovies in it, or the dessert has unfortunate lumps of unknown provenance, one can discreetly dispose of one item and concentrate on the others. Usually the talk is interesting and no one is keeping score on how many bites one takes of something. Anybody who knows me is aware of my aversion to fish or seafood of any kind (I make sure of it!), so I can accept dinner invitations with a serene faith that it will be largely edible, and just may be delicious. I do seem to have whittled my acquaintance to largely good cooks who enjoy traditional food well-prepared. This wasn't an intentional process, but maybe subconsciously I was being deft and purposeful - or I'll throw a bone to jeankfl and allow the possibility of divine intervention. True, since I have moved to the semi-sticks, I may have to add to the publishing of my anti-piscine bias, a rider to the effect that I also do not care to eat anything that has been shot. This is not because I oppose hunting; with the constant attacks on my landscaping from voracious deer, I applaud hunting and offer opportunities to engage in it upon my property at all times, in season or out, to any hunter who feels that knocking off the local Bambi is a whale of an idea. If people shot only cows and chickens and pigs and sheep - and occasionally each other - I could attend dinners at the houses of manly men or of Sarah Palin without a tremor, but sadly, when the entrée has been shot, it is always more exotic fare. Basically anytime the meat can be described as 'gamy', please exclude me from the invitation list. Fortunately I don't have many vegetarians in my circle, because those folks tend to fall upon innocent legumes or leafy greens which are delightfully edible in themselves and, probably from deep motives of carnivore-envy, render them by way of creative cookery into appalling messes that require removal of one's tongue, or at least the taste buds thereon, to enjoy.
But in a potluck event (calling it a potluck dinner implies an edibility which I have never encountered), there are not a bevy of dishes concocted by the same hand. Each guest reaches into his or her special place where he or she keeps a set of recipes (most often just one recipe actually, labelled "My specialty") and pulls forth a treasured dish that is expected to 'knock 'em dead'. In most cases this is no idle threat. Not only do a series of crimes against humanity appear in dishes covered with tinfoil or Saran-wrap, but the authors of these enormities have eyes for nothing save the quantity of this mess that is consumed by each and every guest. No tucking the chocolate tuna fish and turnip dessert into one's pocket, as one might do at a normal meal, where one would not have encountered it in the first place. No pushing the venison and prune sausage into a napkin. Even that final refuge of the trapped at normal dinners, of taking small bites and minimizing the tongue-time given to the foreign substance as much as possible while one gulps vast quantities of alcohol or Pepsi to wash it down quickly and unchewed, because the diamond-drill eyes of the provider of that particular pot watch every movement of the jaw that holds the special treat.
I have, this summer, begun attending meetings of a men's group over in Broome County, and everything was going along well enough until it was decided by the majority of the group that nothing would do but to have a potluck dinner - and to make this a monthly event. Having said 'men' and 'potluck' in the same sentence, I feel it would be de trop to say this is a gay men's group. Whereas these folks are nice enough in their way, (although I have not found the love connection for which I had secretly hoped), the group is more or less led by a vegan and his equally vegan significant other, and many of the members are of very limited income. When a potluck among the carnivorous and comfortably circumstanced is dreadful, I can only imagine the extent of harm that can be inflicted by the flesh-deprived and the impoverished. And imagine it I will have to do, because there is no way in hell I am going to attend this orgy. Unfortunately the group is quite small, and if I plead a prior commitment, they are perfectly capable of re-scheduling to fit my supposed schedule. There is no depth to which folks will not sink, once they are seized with the fever to hold a potluck. I really think potlucks are an alternative for those who are deeply stressed to going on a shooting rampage, so fiercely do the perps cling to the plan through any sort of cavilling and demurral. I am torn between ceasing to attend the group altogether, and rushing in with MY special dish and dropping it off and claiming a workplace emergency that calls me right back to the office instantly. But I can't really do this every month, though; suspicions will be raised.
Any hope that this event could be somehow endured were laid to rest at the last meeting when a guy attended whom I had not seen before. In the endless discussion of logistics (gay men can talk anything to death once they find themselves in any kind of organizing mode), the lad piped up with, "Can we do any cooking on site here?" and went on to aver that he had a recipe he called "Poor Man's Surprise" ("and I have never found it written down anywhere!") that "everybody loves". My heart was sinking like a mafioso encased in concrete, when he added dismissively, "unless they, like, don't like tuna fish or something." Oh. My. God. I don't know where the "surprise" comes in in the name of the dish, but I totally get the "poor man" part. Poor, indeed! Poor anybody that has to eat the shit. Here's a tip: just as a matter of self-preservation, NEVER eat anything with the word 'surprise' in the name. It will be a surprise all right, but not of the type for which one might hope. More like the manner in which Pearl Harbor was a surprise.
I have, in my long life, been trapped surprisingly often in doctors' offices where the reading material consisted solely of some dreadful medical treatise and tattered copies of Family Circle and Ladies' Home Journal. In desperation, I have opened one of those magazines for the homemaker, and regularly found 'quick or 'easy' or 'inexpensive' recipes. And without exception these recipes have required tuna fish and that other gross offense to the tongue, cream of mushroom soup. These are two things that I simply will not eat. They are disgusting in and of themselves, and combined and added to anything else they pull it down to their level. I firmly believe you can taste a single drop of mushroom soup dropped into a vat of hot chilies. And you can smell tuna a furlong away, even when the intervening distance includes a hog farm and a sewage plant. What is it with women and the eating of gross substances?
Have you ever had the pleasure of dining at the home of a woman who is on a diet? Of course you have - despite the billows of flesh around us which would argue to the contrary, virtually all women spend large portions of their existence on diets. Certainly single women do; there is a tendency among the married of both sexes to feel that once the deal is sealed, the advertising can be dispensed with in matters of appearance, manners and just about everything else. The mate is now enjoined to love one for “who they really are” and not for how they look, and 'how they really are' tends to reach levels of behavior and tonnage that are not for the faint of heart. But for those of us who are perforce single, there is a high likelihood that our friends will include a large portion of females who are similarly circumstanced. And it is a scientific fact that in any group of three single women, one, at least, will be on a diet at any given moment. Since few members of either sex would dream of actually eating less, the fairer sex has developed the strategem of "substituting". (Vegetarians are also adept at this - think 'tofurkey' if you can do so without throwing up in your mouth.) So as you wanly pick at the meal served by a friend who pre-diet was a wondrous cook, she gleefully regales you with such newly-discovered dieter's secrets as "instead of beef, you just use parsnips" or '"you just replace the butter with tofu paste". A woman on a diet is an angry woman, and everybody's gonna suffer, damn it. (There are two other strategies engaged in by the average dieter: 1) weighing everything, which would work if they weighed it instead of eating it, but alas! they tend to do both; and 2) talking endlessly about the diet and portions and carbs and grams and slip-ups and rewards until no one is willing to come near them, which does reduce the amount of food they are offered by others, but unfortunately also results in them eating the share they had planned for the guest who sadly found an emergency that required his or her absence from the feast of dietary factoids and low-cal substitutions, at the last minute)
I had a friend (a slim friend) who was a gourmet cook - and I mean she really was the finest cook I have ever known. She remained slim largely by cooking, which she loved better than eating, and then inviting others to eat her end results. She was so good a cook that she actually induced me - a famously picky eater - to eat several vegetables that I had hitherto refused to even try - mostly those of the brassica family: Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, broccoli - which are now among my favorite vegetables - by making seemingly plain, but actually devilishly clever dishes from them. Only once that I know, did she slip into the substitution mode. She served up a faux potato salad which substituted equal measures of cooked broccoli and cauliflower for the potatoes. The secret, she said, slipping into Family Circle mode, is using celery seed in the salad. I loved it, although I have never been able to make mine taste as wonderful as hers did. No matter, it is still pretty good. It is my secret specialty. I bring it to all the potlucks to which I am forced to go. Everybody hates it - few people really like cauliflower or broccoli anyway. Some take a tiny dab, but some take none at all.
And don't let these latter folks think I don't notice. I take names; I have a list. 03 สิงหาคม Jeez, Where am I?Despite the rumors, my prolonged absence is not because I am busy counting lottery winnings, nor have I gone off my meds and begun the killings again. The sad truth is that I have a complete lack of time management skills; were Mrs. Cox, my happily-remembered first grade teacher still grading me on part two of the old report card where my personal traits and skills were listed, “Uses Time Wisely” would be receiving a resounding ‘F’, if Fs can be said to resound. The sad truth is that I find it impossible to do anything that relies on my own initiative and skills as a ‘self-starter’– particularly writing – unless I have an open-ended block of time, which means days without work. These being two per week, I must write on either Saturday or Sunday, preferably in the morning. Because I work all week in Smallville, then drive two to three hours on Friday to Reedville to one of the most paradisiacal spots that exists on old Gæia, and must use a goodly portion of Sunday driving back again to an apartment which has won awards for squalor, and because the family tradition of Sunday breakfast at Mom’s has been modified to Sunday breakfast with Mom but at David’s, I am reduced to Saturday as an option. This was fine as long as snow blew and rain fell and lowering clouds made huddling indoors warming my fingers over a smoking computer an attractive option, but lately it has been Summer (you may have noticed), and the stately gardens and messuages have been a-tweet with birds to feed and watch, with rapidly growing lawns to be kept in trim, with windows of opportunity opening and closing within minutes for planting and pruning and mulching and weeding and the murder of several thousands of Japanese beetles which would rather eat my cherry leaves than mate (although from the evidence they do plenty of both), with sheds to be painted and trees to be cut, firewood to be stacked, AND all this lurking in the dark recesses of my calendar while both the hammock has been hung beneath two o’ershadowing ashes and the garden swing has been swung beneath an ancient willow. One can appreciate that there is competition for the Shaughnessy Saturday which is fraught enough to begin with, with competition from my overweening indolence.
There are little logistical things – such as the annoying fact that I have an Apple in Reedville and a PC in Smallville, and my blog was set up on the latter, meaning that none of the formatting that occurs on computer A remains in place on computer B when I actually post, so that I write on the Apple, e-mail it to myself on the PC, reformat it – I can’t write without italics, etc. – so that I require two surges of energy to get ‘er done, which, when both occur within a single weekend, is enough to blow most of my internal circuits. I refer to those circuits which reside within my cranium; my computers seem perfectly able to cope while carrying on their rivalry which results in them barely speaking to each other. Happily I don’t have a sex life to take up my time (Sister Mary Frowniface would be so pleased), but otherwise, I am a mass of conflicting impulses. I have e-mailed none of my friends in months, and the energy required in dealing with the guilt is daunting. I did start an entry two weeks ago, but it remains incomplete. I swore I would get a blog, as well as other things done this weekend, but on Thursday I got a ‘sorry for the short notice’ e-mail from my niece-n-law Guinevere (the one with the two sets of twins) saying that she’d be in town from KY (the state, not the lubricant) for a few days, and would greatly like to see me Saturday at her Mom-in-law’s place (my brother Gary’s widow, Joan’s house) which is a good twenty miles or so from Reedville. Well, what am I to do?
So no blog this week, either. I was at Lowe’s garden department last weekend and was aghast to see it full of chrysanthemums. This is the surest sign of Summer’s end that I know. When I was young, we had a host of those brick-colored chrysanthemums in front of the house, and I was always depressed when they began to bloom because it meant school and the end of all hope for another 9 months (Usually it meant I’d be having a new brother soon, too, but that’s another story). This week I saw a few goldenrod blooming, and even, on my trip back to Smallville, no less than four maples with an orange tinge, so I guess I’ll be having more time indoors soon. That is, if a dream I had on Thursday can be safely ignored. I dreamed I was having an acrimonious argument with a monk who was not supposed to leave his cell, but who became so irate at me, he did so and came right up to me. “I hope you realize,” he sneered, “that you have only 24 days more to live!” It was one of those dreams that kind of stay with one all day, and later that day it occurred to me that those 24 days brought me exactly to my birthday – which was a thought nearly as unpleasant as the monk’s prophecy; it would be particularly galling of Fortune to make me have to go through a birthday and my demise on the same day – a two for one dose of nastiness that would be entirely typical.
As to loose ends, or late-breaking news, there is little, except that my first Social Security payment arrived exactly on time as promised. Mom has totally fallen in love with her new apartment at Desolation Pines. “They do everything for me,” she says – and then as if to demonstrate her complete divorce from reality anew, she adds, “and it doesn’t cost me a cent!” But her memory has improved. She is content and happy. She has told us at various times that she lives in a school and in a church. She even went to some church thing there where the “priest” performed the service with a toddler tucked under his arm resting on his hip. This would be news indeed, were the ‘priest’ of the religion she imagines him to be. They even have got her doing those senior calisthenics – although not, one hopes, during the services. She has gained weight – much-needed – and looks ten years younger, which is still old as hell, but in a nicer way. It is working out so much better than any of us dared hope, and she loves her visits to my house for breakfast; admires the house, the kitchen, the grounds – everything is just A-OK with her. She even remembers being there before; she especially loves an old corkscrew willow we have in which I hung one of those terra cotta sun-faces I had when I lived in Texas, and which has begun to dissolve in the rains and snows of NY until it has this sort of goofy, leering grimace where once a smile was displayed, rendering it a surprisingly good likeness to several of my less savory cousins. She tells us she “remembers” seeing that tree when walking with her mother which, I guess, means at the least that she is dwelling in the Happy Place.
And so I miss another week of the old blogamy. I will do better soon, I promise both of you. 05 กรกฎาคม EntanglementsA year ago, our nation’s foreign adventurism was no more than something I saw stories about on cable TV when there was nothing better on, and now I suddenly have no less than three relatives dodging bombs and rockets in the desert wastes of Iraq and Afghanistan. In a family which had a combined total of exactly three weeks of presence during the Viet Nam hi-jinks, despite having eligible male members up the ying-yang at that time, this seems like a high degree of carelessness. I cannot account for this sudden collective lapse on our part. I have spoken of my cousin Warren and his IED-removal activities during which he witnessed the death of his group leader, and I believe I touched on another cousin, who in his mid-fifties suddenly finds himself seeking and destroying poppy crops in Afghanistan, driving up the value of our personal heroin stashes, making them a hell of a lot better investment than any of the stocks in my 401(k). Now I suddenly find that the spouse of George’s daughter Graciela, he being a lad of Mexican heritage from Texas (who inexplicably speaks nary a work of Spanish while Graciela is fluent), who has been happily hauling in the Yankee dollars by the bushelsful in Kuwait for one of the major American players in infrastructure projects, is IM-ing me from Balad in Iraq. “What ho?” I queried, and although I never learned exactly how the geographic shift came about, I have learned that his IT career currently consists of time on a computer punctuated by the donning and doffing of flak jacket and ducking for cover. It certainly makes my current IT position look even more wan and boring than I had felt it to be hitherto. I would be totally green with envy, were his work schedule not consisting of seven-day weeks of 12 hour days. He tells me he works, goes to a gym, and sleeps (the sleeping and gym are two different activities, he does not sleep in the gym). He fails to mention any pauses to pick stray bits of shrapnel from his epidermis, but one reads between the lines. Even I would not accept a job in such interesting surroundings if it meant a work week of so many hours. One does not, parenthetically, think of there being gyms in Balad, Iraq; I wonder if he lifts sheep or tries camel-pulling.
Alberto has found a position back in Texas which he will be starting after this month, although he is considering a position in Nigeria on an oil rig where he would earn $140K a year, and better yet, have three week vacations after every 8 weeks. Now that sounds more my style, except that he will be out on a rig, and the whole point of these jobs for me is getting to meet the local populace. One of the more pressing reasons for Alberto to leave his current location is that the USA tax exemption for offshore earnings comes to a crashing close this month. This exemption was always under threat, since it was portrayed as a gift to the corporations which had overseas business. Indubitably it benefited those corporations, but even more it benefited the nation. My facts are from the mid-nineties, when I was more concerned with such things, but I doubt that much has changed. Other than Korea, NONE of the industrialized nations tax offshore earnings of their citizens (by offshore earnings, I am not speaking of investments, but of earned wages by citizens who are actually working and living outside the country). The reason for this is simple: very few people are willing to live in foreign lands, especially those of the Third World, without a compelling financial reason to do so, and any money earned by company or individual there and sent back here is pure gravy for the nation. Other than me, few Americans in Saudi would have stayed a minute longer if they were not making substantially more than they could earn at home. This difference largely arose from the fact that their earnings were not taxed. So companies from the U.S. remained competitive because they could bid on projects knowing that their labor costs were not out of line with those of their foreign competitors. Though American wages were still somewhat higher, this was offset by the generally good reputation American companies had for expertise and jobs well done.
Now, in a time when our economy is crashing and unemployment is rising we have, with good old American know-how, set up a situation where 1) our companies must pay double the wages of their competitors and/or 2) our companies must hire non-American workers either from lands which do not tax their offshore citizens (such as Britain, Germany, Ireland and so forth) or where the wages are so low that even with taxes, the workers are happy to get the wage offered. I do support the idea that offshore workers should pay Social Security taxes, since most will collect Social Security at some point if the system doesn’t crash, but income taxes should remain exempt. The U.S. exemption was only on the first 80 or 90 thousand dollars per year anyway, which is not so generous as one might think since one had to include the value of company-paid travel, lodging and other company supplied bennies. So just when jobs are becoming scarce, a bunch of experienced workers, workers like Alberto who have proved they are willing to work under adverse conditions will be coming home to compete with our recent high school and college graduates. And our companies may be losing bids which put some money into the economy; although you may be sure that this new law may be closing the loophole which most benefits the actual workers, it surely is not closing anything that is really allowing old Exxon-Mobil or Halliburton to screw the body politic. Much of the money earned abroad is spent back in the USA; many of the younger workers I met overseas were putting in an unhappy two years solely to get the down payment for a house. We all know that the real estate market here is so robust that the loss of new entrants into the market is no cause for concern. Way to go, Uncle Sam!
On a more local note, I seem to have lucked into the one company in America that is growing by leaps and bounds when I came to Smallville Solutions for Everything, Inc. It turns out that everything is just what the country needs solutions for, and the village here is humming with the vigorous effort of my company to supply them. Our revenue has been doubling yearly and we had, last I knew, some 150 positions seeking workers. We are at it 24/7, and any day that our computer is not working at full blast (it tells all the line workers what to do next, and directs some highly complex manufacturing processes) we lose a couple of million bucks. So the management views such natural disasters as a national holiday much as the residents of New Orleans viewed hurricane Katrina. “But wait,” they cry, “Maybe we can save something from the wreck!” And reviewing their options, they realize that the IT department is on salary, and that such upgrades as require a computer shut-down can be done while the wage-earners are relaxing on their yachts with about ten tall cool ones, with no overtime costs. And the cry goes out: “Let Dave do it!”
Thus it was that I worked yesterday evening, and will shortly be headed workwards on this fine Saturday to work until 11 p.m. if all goes well, and until next week at this time if all goes badly. Ah, Retirement, where is thy sting? While Alberto is about 20 days from a return to his homeland, I am a similar number of days from my first full social security cheque and I am lovin’ it. The additional cash will be used to pay off the last of my debts (other than my mortgage) which should take about 3 months and then I will make one or two discretionary purchases I have in mind and then FREEDOM!! I have heard of folks complaining that retirement gave them a big bunch of time with nothing to do, and I ask, “And what is the downside?” Nothing is my favorite thing to do. What part of retirement don’t they comprehend? Some days I will do nothing in a hammock; some days I will do nothing on my deck and maybe, if I can still afford gas, some days I will visit folks and do nothing at their houses. And don’t think, if I find them cleaning their gutters or mowing their lawns, that I will be guilted into some foolish remark like, “Is there any way I can help?” John Milton was a terrible human being and a boring poet, but he did pen the single greatest line in all of poetry: “They also serve who only stand and wait.” (He was bitching about being blind at the time – he fails to mention in the poem that he kept his daughters home and treated them like servants at the time, but hey, we all have our flaws). I plan to serve my ass off, in the deepest Miltonian sense.
And now it is time for me to go to work. Today. Saturday. Our nation’s ‘morning after’ when any decent American is lying in bed with a cold towel over his or her eyes.
Do you believe that shit? 22 มิถุนายน Fortuna's WheelNo one is more keenly aware than I that I have been sadly remiss in my bloggish duties, and that, all over America, ones of people are crying, "What ho?" And it would be nice to say that I have had a life so full that my time had calls upon it that were unrelenting. But the truth is that I am and have always been a lazy and unreliable correspondent, and that I have actually done rather better blogwise than I had any reason, based on experience, to expect. There were, of course, a few things that kept me from slipping into a coma these past weeks, but not really all that many. Faithful Shaggarati will recall that me dear auld Mum has been slipping into dementia, and one thing that has happened in the past weeks is the resolution of that issue.
(Later addition) – It is well that I am aware of the malevolence of Fate, since I had a nice taste thereof this morning after the Breakfast Club, when I stopped at Desolation Pines en route to my dreary abode in Smallville preparatory to beginning the workweek, to see Mom for the first time since her move. She was all in a doodah. Unfortunately, she is forced to share a bathroom with one other lady there, and it seems she opened the door when said lady was enthroned. The lady was understandably agitated and complained to the management. It is unclear whether the complaint was made within the same minute – the lady hopping frantically down the hall with her pants about her ankles, but the impact on Mom was as if this were the case. Back in a rush has come all her paranoia and fear of offending or of fearsome retribution. She was in her room door closed when I arrived, and is afraid now to use the bathroom. What she has done to relieve the necessary problem in which this results is best passed over in silence. I had a talk with a really nice woman on the desk, and she is going to check frequently to make sure Mom is having her needs taken care of. But this has changed Mom’s feelings about the place radically (“It used to be so nice here,” she told me.) and I very much fear that when Luke makes his first visit tomorrow it will set him in a doodah greater than hers. There is no good solution to Mom’s illness other than Desolation Pines; she simply cannot return to where she was before – even if someone moved there with her, she is rapidly moving beyond the abilities of a non-professional to cope. There is no room available at Des Pines with its own bathroom, and I am not sure it would be affordable were one to open up. So here we are back (nearly) at square one.
Ah, well, Fate is not our friend. There is, of course, another being reputed to be in charge of these things, but it – or he – of course, is all about love. Maybe I have learned not only how it feels to send a defenseless loved one off to a new life, but also what if feels like to be in an abusive relationship. I know for sure I can’t take a whole lot more of this ‘love’.
Well, we shall see what the future holds. I can’t wait. 31 พฤษภาคม About a BoyLast week, on the second day of a perfect weekend, George and I took Mom to the local cemetery to plant some flowers on the family graves. Our local cemetery - especially the older part which holds stones of folks born in the 1700s - is an exceptionally lovely and peaceful place. Like an ocean beach, it is a nice place to visit, but one wouldn't want to be there permanently. Getting started on this expedition was not dissimilar to setting out on an Arctic trek; the preparations were onerous. Although we had no need to stock up on pemmican and thick outerwear, we did have to bring Mom around to the idea of going in the clothes she had on; she had it in her head that we were headed for either church or a funeral. Finally, though we were able to stop just short of flinging her into the back of a truck, and we were on her way. She began declaiming some poem on the way, that began "Under the something something sky/ Dig my grave and let me lie...". Really, when one's parental unit is as loony as a bedbug, it can be kind of funny. She couldn't tell you who I am to save her life, but she can quote oodles of poetry and suchlike. Anyway, once we arrived, she was far more in the present and actually recognized the graves of Dad and Frankie. "He was such a sweet little boy," she said. Mom and Frankie had a very special relationship - one quite different from that which she had with the rest of us. She must have sensed (or perhaps nature gave a more concrete hint) that he was to be the last of her children, and at a very early point, she and he became pals. There was never any doubt that she was the parent and he the child; Mom wasn't one to tolerate any rannygazoo. But unlike the the parent that tries to be a kid with her child, she drew him into being semi-adult at an early age. It isn't that she conversed on adult topics, but they had adult-like conversations. I think she must have told herself that this one she would enjoy. And he enjoyed her back - not only the parental love thing, but a really friendly laughing-at-each-other's-foibles, and at those of others, in a complicit best-friend sort of way. Several of us began as red-heads then darkened, but Frankie remained a redhead, although not the flame-haired youth of fiction, but more a dark-red/brown combination. He had the requisite number of freckles to play Tom Sawyer in any film, and the same blue eyes that were the gift or burden of all of us. Frankie had no mild emotions, he was passionate about everything. When he was thwarted his whole body would droop so theatrically that Mom had to laugh. When things went his way, which they did surprisingly often, he enjoyed life to the max. He was the most like that Calvin of Calvin and Hobbes of all the children I have ever seen. Frankie's Hobbes, however, was not a stuffed animal, but a bicycle. From the moment he could walk, he wanted to ride. It was not long after he could reach the handlebars of a two-wheeler that he began asking his older brothers if he could 'walk their bike'. He couldn't ride, but he would hold the handlebars and walk with the bike rolling beside him to any place he wanted to go. He hardly seemed to feel that a destination was worth going to, if he couldn't walk there with a bike. If a brother demurred, Mom would say, "Oh, let him use it; you aren't using it." and the brother would usually give in. It mostly seemed weird and bemusing to us that he wanted to walk our bikes, but he never tired of doing so. When he was quite young, he got the measles and on the morning the spots disappeared he came running down the the stairs all excited. "Mom!" he demanded, "I have to go outside. Last night I dreamed how to ride a bike." I don't know how it is now, but back then it was an object of faith that one must remain convalescing indoors for some days after measles for fear of relapse or death or something. I forget how long this period of imprisonment was, but that morning was well within it for Frankie. No way was Mom letting him outside into what was a very cool day. Every so often that day he would renew his plea, saying desperately, "Mom, I'll forget!" But Mom was not about to send her youngest out into the perils of a relapse-inducing Spring and his pleas were in vain. Frankie had the ability to persist when he wanted something which didn't quite descend to the nagging or whining of the rest of us, and thus he wasn't usually sent to the rightabout when he persisted with a request after being denied. Mom, however, was not a parent to reverse her decisions once given, especially in the face of all known medical science, which was how conventional wisdom re measles was regarded in our household. I know when I was recovering from measles, I actually believed that if I went outside, I would, if I didn't actually die, suffer forever in a wasting sort of way. I think I lived in a mental opera of the tragic sort until I was about 20, seeing a sad, though lovely, death for myself at every misstep. Next morning, Frankie arose early and again began the assault on Mom's defenses. "I still remember," he told her, "But I'll forget." Finally she actually gave in; the first time in living memory that such a thing had occurred. "It meant so much to him," she always told us afterward. She wrapped him so thoroughly in so many outer garments that he resembled the world's largest ball of yarn more than he did a human child. So Frankie flew out of the door, stopped only momentarily by the problem of squeezing ten feet of wool thru a three foot opening, and ran to the bike. He picked it up, mounted it, and rode for the first time without a bobble or a hesitation. He was ecstatic and perfectly willing to come inside after his signal achievement. That was Frankie; he never made Mom sorry she had acquiesced in something. They really were a team. But Frankie had wooed and won his one great love, and from then on, seeing Frankie on foot was like seeing Ironsides walking. Frankie was a fighter; the youngest of eight boys (and a girl who could beat most of them), he more than held his own. Our next oldest brother, George, was a very quiet, almost withdrawn boy and tended to get pushed around a bit. One day when George finally snapped on the schoolbus and pummelled a tormentor well and good, Frankie was happier than if he had himself kicked the lad's backside. As the bus reached the Farm, he flew off the bus (the only mode of egress he ever employed) and yelled, "Mom! George beat up a kid on the bus!" This was not tattling, this was heralding victory, and as nearly always was the case, Mom saw Frankie's point of view. At that time, one knew nearly everyone in town, and no one thought twice about letting her child go out on his own in such a safe haven. Frankie made friends easily and was always to be found riding his bike with a group of the boys from Reedville. The whole town was their playground and their kingdom. There was the old dam in town built to power a mill now gone, which created a waterfall about eight or ten feet high, where the boys fished and explored. There was a small park to hang out in. There were various roads here and there which were fully explored. The central hangout, though, was the parking lot at a four-corners adjacent to one of the town's two grocery stores - the Grand Star. "Mom, I am going to Reedville; if you need me call the Grand Star," Frankie would yell as he shot out of the front door on a summer day. The Grand Star had a public telephone facing the parking lot, and if one called its number, whoever was passing - usually one of the boys who rode with Frankie - would answer. If Mom did need Frankie, he'd be told and be on his way home. The parking lot provided a smooth area to ride bikes and try out new tricks, and there was pop (we never called it 'soda') or Fudgsicles available inside when someone had a dime to pay for one or the other. From the first, Frankie had a streak of sweetness in his nature to which people responded. He was popular with other kids his age as well as with adults; even his older siblings were kind of proud of him and only beat him up when it was entirely necessary. And those siblings had to be well up in the ranks by age to be able to do so, because Frankie fought with his whole being just as he did everything else. He was able to persuade his friends to do almost anything. One morning he was up at the crack of dawn because, he told Mom, "I have to bring back the bike I borrowed." This set all Mom's sensors on alert, because dishonesty of any sort was a super no-no in her book; an attitude she passed to all her children. "What do you mean, you borrowed a bike?" Apparently some malfunction in his own bike led him to borrow that of a girl he knew, because it had been getting dark and 'home by dark' was the law in our house. It was never really clear to me if the girl loaned the bike willingly or unknowingly, but Frankie was off and had returned it very early in the morning as he had promised her (or himself) to do. He then had to walk home from wherever the girl lived. Reedville was a mile from the Farm, and that distance was taken for granted by all off us when we were young. We walked to the store, to the library (how I loved coming home with new books to read!), to church, to meet our friends, to play in any of a dozen places. To us the walk to Reedville was merely an outer extension of 'home'. Once on a really hot day, Frankie arrived home all tired and sweaty (the bike must have been in need of repair, since he was walking), and he told Mom, "I trudged all the way home." When Frankie was only about eleven, he acquired a girlfriend, Brooke Kemp. In every way he flew headlong into life. I went off to college when Frankie was only five, so much of what I know of Frankie's adventures are what I was told by Mom or the other kids. I was fortunate enough to meet his greatest friend, though. This was Old Dog Tray, a stray dog that showed up one day and between whom and Frankie it was love at first sight. Frankie presented the dog to Mom with such a heart-rending plea to keep him that her defenses were breached after only a brief sortie, and her usual, "but No Animals In The House!" was the sign of total surrender. Since the dog equalled Frankie in its ability to look dejected and oppressed when this was needed, Mom took to calling him (or her) "Old Dog Tray" and that was what we always called him. Frankie loved his dog as he loved his bike. Oddly none of the rest of us really had a dog, like Frankie had Old Dog Tray. When I was very young, we had acquired a wonderful old collie along with the Farm which those of us who were around then liked, but it was a working dog and we liked it like we liked our horses or chickens. There had been other dogs, but ODT was a pal. There was another story of another animal pal of Frankie's which Mom used to tell me, though I wasn't home at the time it happened. Dad had begun calling Frankie 'Deedee' early on, and we all called him that most of the time. One summer, early each morning when Frankie would be eating his breakfast cereal, a bird used to perch on the wire that ran to the house from the pole by the road. The bird had a loud cry that sounded like it was calling, "Deedee! Deedee!" Frankie would run to the door and call out "I'm coming!" One morning, when he was being summoned by the bird, he lost patience and ran into the yard and yelled, "I'm coming out later; can't you see that I'm eating??" One day, during a lovely June when Frankie was 12, some guy from Hagerty, the village to the east of Reedville, had a few beers too many and killed a dog near our house while driving. The next day the same guy had a few more beers and killed Frankie, who was riding his bicycle. No one did much about it to the guy - this was back before MADD and the legal attitude was pretty much that "Boys will be boys." I am not sure he was even fined. Mom is an extremely private person, and whatever mourning she did, she did privately. I have seen her cry only once in her life before the onset of her dementia, and that was not for Frankie, but for the death of her sister's three-year-old from heart surgery. But Mom had lost one of her best friends and she spoke much about Frankie. Liam has a song where he says, "I have seen my mother at too many graves.," and I am pretty sure that this was probably the hardest of all such events for her. She'd go sometimes to maintain Frankie's grave and every so often she'd find a letter by his headstone. These continued to appear through the years, and it turned out they were from Frankie's girlfriend Brooke. Brooke went on to college and became a nurse but she continued to leave these letters; the letters only stopped when she suddenly died at the age of 21. One day, years after Frankie died, Rob came across an old camera and found there was partially exposed film in it. When we developed the pictures they were all pictures of Frankie; Frankie behind the wheel of our car (I am sure he would have transferred his love for his bike to love for a car had he reached 16); Frankie in his basketball jersey; Frankie with his arm draped over Old Dog Tray. It's all there - the reddish hair, the blue eyes, the sweet half-smile. None of us remember taking the pictures, but it was a wonderful gift to see Frankie again as we remembered him. So the last to join our family was the first to leave it. I really did not think Mom would know where she was last Sunday when she went with George and me to tend the graves, but she did, and she remembered the boy she laid there 39 years ago. And, "He was such a sweet boy," she said. 24 พฤษภาคม It just Keeps getting BetterAnd what can it be that has our DavidShag dancing in the streets, making little yelps of joy and generally behaving in a way that may cause the pursed lips and hairy eyeballs of the authorities to focus upon him? Well, among the junky-looking mail of the week, waiting for him in a heap on the corner of the kitchen table was a modest envelope from the government - specifically the Social Security Administration which said, on the topic of reaching full retirement age, in the bold face type and italics it deserved, "After that, your benefits will not be reduced, no matter how much you earn." And guess when this happy day which the SSA describes refer to as "that", after which benefits will not be reduced, arrives for the hero of our tale, after adding up days and weeks and so forth, carrying the 1, and rounding down? Ten days from now! Oh Frabjous Day! Calloo! Callay! How did this estimable policy escape my notice until now? I cannot help but say say, but in the words of a lady I admire enormously, "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud to be an American!" Well, maybe the word "overjoyed" fits the case, better than "proud". Whatever. In July, continuing on the theme of jours de gloire, I reach the end of eighteen months at Smallville Solutions, upon which excellent date I will no longer be required to repay that exemplary company for the lavish relocation bonus it dished out to lure me into taking a huge pay cut and entering its employ. Is it possible that there is actually something good about being (a long way) over 40? It just may be so. In short, this means I can begin scooping up $1,934 a month without worry or regret and can work or not, as I wish. Everyone who has not seized upon that blessed "not" in the prior sentence, take one step forward. Well, aren't you the silly goat?! Haven't you been listening? Actually, I can use this lavish sum to rapidly pay off my last credit card, and to take care of the last of the big ticket items I need to get into place (the house is already painted and the roof is new), and then, garçons et filles, the Emancipation Proclamation will have finally taken full effect in the US of A. One of the big ticket items I am thinking seriously of installing is a just-in-time water heating unit. I bought this house largely because of an enormous sunken tiled area in which I can submerge the old corpus up to its eyeballs while bathing, only to find my hot water runs out just about when the water level reaches my coccyx because of the vast area of my tub and the inadequacy of my water heater. A few items from past entries merit updates. For one, my impressive cousin Warren who, you will recall, went directly from the funeral of his grandmother to the mean streets of Baghdad to do bomb disposal work, has lost his group leader to an IED. His group was called to a location to dispose of a reported IED, but upon reaching the site, was unable to locate the device. And then his leader unfortunately did locate it when it exploded, killing him right before Warren's eyes. Warren says this sad event has made him even more determined, upon his egress from the service, to devote his life to bettering the human race, which seems sadly in need of his efforts. In a picture of his leader that Warren forwarded to me the man looks so young. And not long ago, another cousin, who is well over 50, and who has been a member of the Army Reserve for a very long time, has been deployed to Afghanistan to help eradicate the poppy crop. Afghanistan, a war theatre for which some justification can be made, has heated up considerably while most eyes have been fixed upon the foolish war in Iraq. Better, thought GWB and his cronies, to lose two wars, than to win one. One can certainly say with assurance that Mr Bush's place in history is assured, right down there with Buchanan and the first Johnson. Speaking of President Buchanan, do you all know that he was not only gay, but that he lived for 16 years with his boyfriend, Rufus King, who served as Vice President under Franklin Pierce? Oddly, this fascinating biographical datum was omitted from my high school history courses. I had learned that Buchanan had not done much of anything to remember, but apparently he did old Rufus, well and often. Our current vice president would be well advised to follow Mr King's example of making love, not war - and I apologize for the unfortunate visual image I may have inflicted upon you. This liaison was well known to the Washington crowd of the time. Although apparently what happened in Washington stayed in Washington. There is no record as to whether either of the two gentlemen in question assumed a wide stance when in the public facilities of the era. On second thought, I cannot help but feel that Mr Cheney would be as poor at love as he is at his current hobby, but at least a lot fewer people would be getting screwed. Another update concerns me dear old silver-haired mother, who when last mentioned was cause for great concern as she slipped into dementia. With the advent of Spring, and with our determined efforts to see that she has more company more often, she has become remarkably happier, although she still has no clue who I am, or what is going on, most of the time. Because she had never been ill, and had no medical records to speak of, and because she controls her own money and circumstances, we were at wits' end in trying to find a solution to getting her into proper care. Now we have found a really good - and affordable - nearby facility, and - wonder of wonders - Mom seems to be interested in moving there. Much of the paperwork has been done, and Mom seems lucid on this topic more than on most others. There are people there she knows, or believes she does, and it is beautifully situated in the town where she currently lives, though it is well on the outskirts; it is, in fact, in a completely rural setting. I think that, in general, people who work in these types of facilities in the small towns, where it tends to be as good a job as is available thereabouts, are often more caring than their urban counterparts. Certainly there are wonderful people in many urban facilities, but there are also often people who do not like their job and who do not like their clients very much. So I think Mom will soon be making the move; I just hope like hell it is as easy and as happy for her as it now appears to be looking as if it will be. "I think it is time to move," she has said. And, "Will you come to see me after I move?" she asks me and, although I know she is only making polite conversation to this man whose identity is a mystery to her, I say, "Of course," and I will. And another update - the fine young lad next door who is a senior in high school and who, for reasons I cannot fathom, plans to join the Marines upon graduation, willing pulled my lawnmower out of the sucking black mud of my western pond at my brother George's request. So the next day, while the lad was out mowing his own family's extensive grounds, I resumed my mowing and within ten minutes I had gotten myself mired in my eastern pond's equally black and equally sucking mud. With good will and great bonhomie (I thought that word had 2 'm's but Spellchecker disagrees and Merriam-Webster ruled in Spellchecker's favor, for once. I stand corrected.), young Paul, for such is his name, got a rope and something with a stronger engine than my mower, and pulled me out again. Once the marines have him, I fear I will be doomed to watch my mower languish in the grip of one or another of my ponds, since I seem to have the learning curve of an addled duck. And what's worse, though I only have two ponds, my estate is bordered by a deep and swift-flowing creek. And now, to put the icing on the cake of my good fortune, I do not have to work Memorial Day weekend after all; moreover the weather is promised to be fair and warm and just what the doctor ordered. I was so buzzed by the prospect of the long weekend, that I went out and mowed my entire lawn after I got home at six p.m. Friday evening, without driving into any body of water. And this was before I opened that portentous envelope from the good folks at Social Security. I may just go out today and mow the entire town of Reedville. 10 พฤษภาคม A Surprise Free DayI woke up at 2:00 a. m. or thereabouts this morning, and now that it is well after 4, I am pretty sure that sleep is not planning to knit up my ravelled sleeve of care any time soon. It is a tad early to be out performing manly tasks in the out-of-doors, so I am reduced to sitting in front of my computer, which gives this moment an eerie feeling of being at work, although this is measurably less unpleasant. However, I am NOT at work and was not there yesterday either because of the happy confluence of two eventualities; the first being that my boss was not anxiously counting the days until my return from vacation and the second being that I have the ethics of a pimp or clergyman. I had taken a week off to go to California, starting last Wednesday on the 30th of April. So I returned as promised on Wednesday of this week and my boss, when he arrived to find me diligently working away in the wee hours of the morning (I am always the first one to arrive at work, since this gets me out of there while there is still some afternoon to be had, and also allows me to get a couple of hours under my belt before I am fully awake to the horror that I am still working at my age). Quoth he, "What are you doing here? I thought you were off all week." Ever one with a snappy comeback, I riposted, "My vacation is finished. I only took a week and I started it last week." And then he said the magic words, "But you are still a day early." The thing was, as soon as he said it, I started to believe it. I did feel like I had come back early - but then when it comes to work, January of 2015 would have seemed too soon. So I told him that rather than going home to my squalid apartment that day (which was an awesomely warm and lovely spring day), I would take off Friday instead. He said OK. I marvelled to all who would listen that I could have done anything so bacon-witted as to return to work a day early. So Friday I arrived at the job in my car, parked it heading outward in the corner of the parking lot closest to the exit as is my wont when I plan to head for Reedville and I went in to begin my workday. My attention was caught by a note on my calendar, which made me realize for the first time that I had, in fact, already taken my full week. I think the boss had been confused by the fact that I had taken the 30th through the 6th, and he was thinking I had taken seven days in May (good title for a book and movie, that), forgetting the 30th, and had returned on the seventh, thus cutting my vacation short by a day. I myself had been confused by the fact that he seemed so positive about it. And now I found I didn't have a day coming after all. But no one seemed aware of that, so I took Friday as agreed, thereby getting a free day off. And a fine day it was, for the expected rain never materialized and I was able to begin mowing the pine flats, which is what we call the middle back yard. I was only moderately disturbed by the fact that I mowed too close to the edge of my rather swampy pond, and got my new John Deere well and truly stuck in this black sucking mud; my mower is even at this moment sitting at a 45-degree angle, up to its vitals in squashy clay. Although I must say I can't see out my window yet in this Stygian darkness; the mower may have disappeared like the mammoths of yore in the La Brea tar pit. Since I have no conscience whatever, I can't account for the fact that I have had trouble sleeping ever since I got home. But so it is, and thus here I sit. My employer, Smallville Solutions for Everything, Inc., is bucking the current economic trend and has been taking orders for its sophisticated and highly expensive products like there is no tomorrow. We have been hiring like madmen, and the plant is running 24/7. The plant is entirely dependent on our computer programs to keep to its scheduling and to tell workers what to do next, and to get our products shipped out to the eager purchasers. So it is extremely difficult to persuade management to allow us to shut down the system for computer upgrades, or balancing data tables and the like, which must be done from time to time. It used to be that one could buy something and use it till it fell to pieces half a century later. But with computers, there is a constant move to improve and every company that has a finger in the data processing pie keeps upgrading its product, which is fine, but they simultaneously refuse to maintain the older versions of their products after a short interval, unless one is prepared to lavish extravagant sums in tribute, to persuade them to keep your old version going just for you. An incidental collateral effect of continuing to use old software, in addition to astronomically higher maintenance fees, is the departure of all the best and brightest programmers, who will find themselves with useless resumés if they continue to work on software that has fallen behind the curve. One can either pay an amount equal to the Gross Domestic Product of several small nations, to purchase the upgrade and an equal sum to hire extra hands or a consulting company to install it, or one can pay a similar sum or more, a fee which will increase yearly, to retain the old version and have the provider keep it running. It is a sort of reverse warranty; rather than guaranteeing a product will work for a period of time, these companies are guaranteeing it won't. There are still companies in the USA making a profit, and the software providers are determined to see that there is something to spend it on. They live to serve. How the above impacts me is as follows. Since we cannot persuade management to allow us to shut our computer system down for as long as a day or two in the ordinary course of events - since the lines that rely on it are making money, while the computer department is merely costing the company, the compromise is that we are allowed to shut down and do the highly complex and somewhat risky work on national holidays and the three-day weekends on which they fall, since that is when many line employees are off for the three-day weekend. This, of course, means that we computer guys who are the lowest of the low have the pleasure of not only working these holidays, but of doing so at hours when only mothers of newborns are customarily awake. But the silver lining to this not inconsiderable cloud is that I have a pretty good boss and he has promised to give us two-for-one hours of comp time for the Memorial Day and Fourth of July weekend work. Each weekend we will work 3 days and get six days off for EACH of these three-day periods later to lie on our backyard decks and contemplate gardening improvements we will never make. This does not totally suck, unlike most of my life. In other news, I am daily awaiting GWB's message to the ruling generals in Myanmar saying, "Heckuva job there!" The generals have barred most of the desperately needed international aid in the wake of the horrific cyclone, and have seized some of the little that has actually arrived in the country. They claim that they know best how to handle the crisis. Their solution so far? They have given twenty-some television sets and a number of DVD players to some of the survivors - and this in areas which have had no electricity since the cyclone. This is is efficiency that should make even FEMA stand up and acknowledge that it has met its superior. Meanwhile about 100,000 bodies are suppurating decoratively in the landscape. I do believe in every effort to relieve the human suffering, but I must admit that a part of me is thinking, "Fine - have it your way!" and turning efforts to some other land where there is need. I often think that riding to the rescue of these clueless dictators and juntas that dot the globe when they are incapable themselves of doing their job, is just as enabling to them as is covering for an addict when he messes up on his job. I would then bombard the nation with every kind of news possible telling the people there how the aid is sitting at the border while they watch their children starve to death. The generals should be very cautious about giving folks nothing to lose. I do think that similar incompetence and indifference shown here in the days after Katrina spotlighted the general incompetence and indifference of the current Administration in ways that will severely cost its party in the coming election. A nearly unprecedented number of senior Republican members of Congress are getting out in anticipation of the débâcle, with their leftover campaign war chests intact, and is moving into cushy lobbying jobs where those funds can legally be used to bribe such other congressmen as remain in office. My own prediction for the coming election is this. I think Obama will be the Democratic nominee, and that Hillary will campaign very hard for him, but not as a vice presidential nominee. I think that in November, McCain will be behind in the polls slightly and that he will win, to the surprise of everyone but me. The hundreds of thousands of angry voters who badly want to make a statement of discontent, but not so badly that they would dream of voting for a black man, will vent their spleen by electing Democrats to Congress. We will end up with an overwhelmingly Democratic Congress and a Republican president. McCain will then have the option of being a much more moderate leader than he would wish and having the chance to leave a record of achievement behind, or of truly being an ideologue and failing as president as badly as the current insensitive fool. On the other hand, a Democratic Congress will have to rise to a standard never before seen to cooperate with McCain enough to make some real achievements possible. They probably will sabotage him, however, and we will stumble on without a single real patriot in the nation's capital however many flag pins may be flaunted, or salutes to the flag may be made. A true patriot is one who puts the nation before the party and before his own personal interest. And the only folks I see doing that are currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. The only possible way I can see Obama winning is if a legitimate conservative makes an independent run and pulls serious numbers of voters away from McCain on the right. It is entirely possible, if Hillary is seen to make a sincere effort to help Obama in November, and McCain wins, that she will be the nominee in 2012. That's my prediction; you heard it here first. And now the sun is rising and birds of all kind are twittering in anticipation of my emergence from the house. I cannot disappoint them. May all of you also find bosses who can't count to seven. 06 พฤษภาคม Bringing in the SheavesDuring the entire period of the Irish potato famine, a period when the death toll from starvation was in the millions, Ireland was exporting food. The landlords of the time were concerned that giving food to the Irish would sap their moral fiber and create a class of indolent parasites dependent on the state. So the millions who starved to death did so with moral fiber intact, one of the more notable moral triumphs in recent history. One must regard with awe the strength of character it required for the ruling political party in Britain to hold fast to its principles regardless of the facts on the ground. As this shows once again, there has always been a party that supported values. Whenever one despairs of the state of mankind, one can add this to the list of proofs that there will always be people who stand fast, adhering to their principles. I am always perplexed when people, who cling to their values through thick and thin against all evidence, are displeased when someone like Ahmedinajad does the same. I have been to Sacramento and back this week. I was scheduled to get there before noon on Thursday, stopping only in Minnesota, but the airline, which has a reputation to uphold, chose to give a long wait on the tarmac and a free extra stop in Las Vegas, a city for which there is no possible excuse, and deposited me in Sacramento as dusk was gathering, at which point I was almost too tired to do what I went there to do. However, I was able to spend Friday and Saturday doing it several times, so I guess all was not lost. The weather there was flawless, what little I saw of it, and I returned to Reedville to find the weather here was pretty darn spiffy, too. All my apple trees are abloom and I saw my first rose-breasted grosbeak, clinging to the little cage full of suet that hangs on the front porch where it can be seen by anyone doing dishes in the kitchen, were such an eventuality actually to occur. I leave you to guess which is the rarer sighting: a rose-breasted grosbeak or me doing the dishes. Speaking of 'rare', have you noticed that this fine and accurate word for the unusual has been largely abandoned (especially on television) in favor of 'unique' wrongly used? I knew you had. And speaking of television, are you as weary as I of the inability of any newsperson to say that someone has said something, without characterizing him or her as either 'speaking out' or 'breaking his silence'? In the latter case, the silence has lasted usually about as long as the period of time between which one drops a hammer on one's toe and that in which one cries, "ouch"? I prefer the phrase "breaking one's silence" to be used sparingly, and to refer to a silence that has lasted months at a minimum. It should also, in my own humble opinion, be said in reference to a statement on a topic which the reluctant speaker has been pressed to discuss and which he has heretofore declined to do. Actually, I err here - there is nothing humble about my opinion, on this or any other topic. "Speaking out," too, has a more specific sense to me than the mere opening of one's yap in the presence of the press. I tend to believe it refers to someone courageously making a public statement on some topic, when one has been pressured implicitly or explicitly not to do so. It involves risk. It does not refer to some divorcee saying she's pissed off at the former spouse. On the topic of "breaking silence" I must ask whyever Barbara Walters found it necessary to cop to rolling in the hay with a former senator. I have had to ingest vast quantities of mind-numbing substances in a futile effort to erase that visual image. Good grief, can't people just shut up? The cacophony of people around me at each step of my recent journey mindlessly babbling to invisible friends would argue that the answer is 'no', but Babs had done so well at shutting up for so long. I had always been unsettled by Babs' kittenish ways with the men she interviewed, but I had no idea that the cat element I was seeing was so much more pussy than kitten. When Ms Walters coyly 'fesses up - 'speaks out' as it were - (and she will) and vouchsafes unto us the name of the unfortunate gentleman, I just pray it isn't going to be Jesse Helms. Having that image inflicted upon my consciousness may keep me from ever sleeping again in this lifetime. I am struggling not to break my silence on the ineffable Jeremiah Wright, a buffoon who so perfectly embodies my image of the ultimate clergyperson that I might have invented him. Holding foolish views goes with the territory, self-aggrandizing is a given; for a clergyperson pride is not one of the cardinal sins, it is a job requirement. Blighting the dreams of one's congregation is also the norm; every time a Catholic pol runs for something, some bishop somewhere announces that he personally will deny the eucharist to the poor fish, should said fish ever swim his way. But heretofore such blighting has at least been done under the pretense that the congregant has behaved counter to some holy rule. Old Jeremiah has broken new ground in setting out to screw a congregant who has not only kept within the 'Thou shalt nots' of man and god (at least so far as the old fool has been able to demonstrate), but who had, until now, lauded him at every turn. Poor Barack: with all his experience in diverse cultures, he has apparently missed that fable which ends with the line, "You knew I was a scorpion when you took me in." What we have here, of course, is that age-old struggle between the secular and the clerical powers; one that had such notably happy results in the matter of Thomas a Becket. (Sorry, I am on my Apple and I don't know how to accent the 'a'.) There is every possibility that if Obama were to succeed and actually manage to implement some portion of his message of inclusion, the power of the black ministry, which thrives on persecution, both real and imaginary as, indeed, does the white ministry, might be diminished. It is no accident that the only profession still publicly characterized without any shame as either black or white, other than within that sister branch of entertainment - the music industry - is that of the clergy. Things were much easier when the head of government was also the head of the currently prevailing religion. The old pharoahs were not only kings, they were also gods. Except for that nasty little Akhnaton interval, an early instructive example of what ensues when either a ruler or clergyman (or a god) actually forgets him- or herself and attempts to make some sense of things, the pharoahs did pretty well for a pretty long time. Still the nagging question must have been bubbling under the surface, waiting for someone to - wait for it! - speak out: "How come god keeps dying?" God's regular demise must have caused some discomfort among the sentient, few though they are in any age, moreso perhaps even than the sight (and sound) of him farting or taking a divine dump - one can only hope that the custom of preserving holy relics arose long after samples of that last-mentioned item were to be had. That little contretemps of the 1970s when someone or other declared that god was dead was hardly new stuff - the old Egyptians must have found themselves saying the same thing every few years. I imagine it was unsettling. And yet the Nile still flooded and the sun still rose on schedule. Somewhere along the line, the clerically-minded spotted the flaw and various mythologies arose which kept the priestly class busy interpreting the wishes of the various divinities, who now dwelt on mountaintops or in special chambers, or behind curtains and who were said to whisper the eternal command in the ears of their priests, the command always boiling down to yet another form of "Gimme some cash". Eventually, a great many came to believe that the mouthpiece of the deity resided in the Emerald City - or was it it the Eternal City? - something with an 'E', at any rate, and the message only crescendoed. As the civil government begin to diverge from the religious powers, an inevitable conflict arose, one that today may be stated as basically, "Who gets the newest Cadillac; the reverend or the senator?" Were I a praying man, I would be on my knees beseeching the clouds above to gift old Jeremiah with the same glorious "Thanks" that Becket earned some time back, but since I am not a praying man, being wholly unable to suppress my reasoning for the necessary length of time, I am resigning myself to being forced to watch old Jer wave his tongue as if it were his dick, whenever a television camera is in sight. For all the service that Jer is rendering unto the black god, it pales (pardon the pun) in comparison to the service he is rendering unto the white Caesar. Were I a conspiracy theorist, I would be certain of the machinations of K. Rove in the old fool's prattlings. I am not a conspiracy theorist, but I am a firm believer that there is no degree of foolishness so far-fetched that someone somewhere will not attain it. While old Jer has done what he can to ensure that the church retain its separate colors, it is as nothing to the service he has rendered to the millions of white folks who would swim in pools of feces before they would vote for a black man - the so-called "Reagan Democrats" whose sobriquet has the same whiff of perfidy one might discern in "Arab Zionist". These are folks who will tell a pollster (or anyone else who asks) that, of course, "Obama's my man!" as they head for, or emerge from the polls in which they vote for anyone but. I imagine such folk pride themselves that the old cliche "At least he's honest" will never be applied to them. One can only admire someone who remains so true to his inner self. I imagine the reflection that they now have a new Al Sharpton to live with seems a small price to pay for the terrific cover old Jer has extended to them. "Well, I wanted to vote for Obama, but, gee, that church he goes to...". Actually, the current public figure that Jer most resembles is Senator Craig, who preaches about the vileness of the gay folks while searching frantically for one or another of them who is willing to offer his dick for the sucking; similarly does Jer revile the white man publicly while doing more to serve the worst of that ilk than most other men since slavery was abolished. And my bet is the sheep will continue to flock to his presence for the shearing. "Ka-ching!" goes the cash register. |
|
|